Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7d650184".
Did you mean:
650184
2015 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
...bit pattern.
So, a short version would be that poison is like undef, except you get to
include the overflow bits of the computation in your undef value.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150129/7d650184/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 29
5
[LLVMdev] RFC: Proposal for Poison Semantics
On 01/28/2015 07:02 AM, Sean Silva wrote:
> Could you maybe provide an example where replacing `%always_poison`
> with `undef` will change the meaning? At least for me, the thing that
> I'm most unclear about is how poison differs from undef.
I will second this request for much the same reason.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:50 AM, David Majnemer
>