Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7d291e83".
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Nate Begeman <natebegeman at me.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> In my opinion, the proper direction for shuffles is:
>>
>> 1. Back out your patch.
>> 2. Move the functionality of "is splat" etc to method somewhere, e.g.
>> on SDNode.
>> 3. Introduce a new
2009 Feb 23
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> In my opinion, the proper direction for shuffles is:
>
> 1. Back out your patch.
> 2. Move the functionality of "is splat" etc to method somewhere, e.g.
> on SDNode.
> 3. Introduce a new ShuffleVectorSDNode that only has two SDValue
> operands (the two input vectors), but that also contains an array of
> ints in
2009 Feb 24
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
...shuffles (which are all of them). Variable
shuffles would need to be represented as target nodes at present, and
my work will not change that.
Nate
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090223/7d291e83/attachment.html>