search for: 7ca8eec281aaa34daeac9b9a398b9215e7

...ar, Lukas Stadler (Oracle Labs), Jan Vitek (Northeastern), >> Alexander Bertram (BeDataDriven) >> >> [1] https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Friotworkshop.github.io%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cj.vitek%40northeastern.edu%7C649169c229e1438e351808d7bb05473a%7Ca8eec281aaa34daeac9b9a398b9215e7%7C0%7C0%7C637183503671619822&sdata=pATfh3Mmv%2FT1UvElIczwLpf4dzg7jEo0M249m6xa0Dg%3D&reserved=0 >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://nam05.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F...

I hope you don?t mind us using this mailing list for a small advertisement, but we think it is most relevant for this group: We'd like to invite you to RIOT 2020 - the 5rd workshop on R Implementation, Optimization and Tooling [1]. It will take place co-located with, and during, useR! 2020 in St. Louis on July 8th. RIOT is an excellent venue for deep technical discussions about R

Hi Jiefei and Kylie, Great to see people engaging with the ALTREP framework and identifying places we may need more tooling. Comments inline. On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:22 PM King Jiefei <szwjf08 at gmail.com> wrote: > > If that is the case and you are 100% sure the reference number should be 1 > for your variable *y*, my solution is to call *SET_NAMED *in C++ to reset > the

Hi Kylie, Is it a list with only numerics in it? (I only see REALSXPs there, but obviously inspect isn't showing all of them). If so, you could load it up into one big vector and then also keep partitioning information around. Bioconductor does this (see ?IRanges::CompressedList ). The potential benefit here being that the underlying large vector could then be a big out-of-memory altrep. How

...> > ______________________________________________ > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fr-devel&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cj.vitek%40northeastern.edu%7C65c14d53fbc44634f88508d6a0f9151d%7Ca8eec281aaa34daeac9b9a398b9215e7%7C0%7C0%7C636873389038367455&amp;sdata=vrZX4jUoakFB%2FRBG6aTjpYsw4fv4NfvIszOxNLhb7Rs%3D&amp;reserved=0

On Tue, Mar 5, 2019 at 12:49 PM jan Vitek <vitekj at icloud.com> wrote: > Everything is possible. One can compile C++ into JavaScript. > > But why? > > I would like to support Java style syntax for class definitions. (Then it could transcompile into either S3 or S4). And possibly change some other things while I'm at it. Maybe, integers (rather than numerics) as

It may be possible to create an R-like programming language that transcompiles into R code (or otherwise constructs R objects and calls R functions). I'm not sure whether it would pass R check or not, I will probably try... But the bigger question is: Should CRAN accept packages written in such a way? I could email Kurt Hornik or Uwe Ligges, and ask them. However, I thought that I would ask

> On Friday, May 15, 2020, 12:13:04 PM EDT, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote: > On 15 May 2020 at 15:41, Martin Maechler wrote: > | <whining> > | > |??? Why does nobody anymore? help R development by working with > |??? "R-devel", or at least then the alpha, beta and the "RC" > |??? (Release Candidate) versions that we release daily