Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7ca3547e".
2007 Nov 22
0
[LLVMdev] C embedded extensions and LLVM
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Christopher Lamb wrote:
>> Unlike alignment and volatility, I think that the address space qualifier
>> should be represented explicitly in the type system. The reason for this
> I've come across a hitch. Store instructions do not reference the pointer
> type in the .bc format, only the stored type. The .bc reader constructs the
> pointer type
2007 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] C embedded extensions and LLVM
...> what the difference is though. :)
Should I take the same approach to the encoding of pointer types in
the pointer table?
--
Christopher Lamb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20071124/7ca3547e/attachment.html>
2007 Nov 21
2
[LLVMdev] C embedded extensions and LLVM
On Nov 11, 2007, at 9:52 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Christopher Lamb wrote:
>
>> I've been playing around with clang/LLVM looking at adding partial
>> support for the draft technical report for embedded C extensions
>> (TR18037, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/
>> n1169.pdf), specifically named address