Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7c5e9ed0c".
2010 Aug 04
1
Using virtio as a physical (wire-level) transport
...think something
like this has any hope, I'd rather not waste another month of my life.
If you can think of a solution that is likely to be "the right way", I'd
rather you told me before I implement any code.
Making my life harder since the last time I tried this, mainline commit
7c5e9ed0c (virtio_ring: remove a level of indirection) has removed the
possibility of using an alternative virtqueue implementation. The commit
message suggests that you might be willing to add this capability back.
Would this be an option?
Thanks for your time,
Ira
2010 Aug 04
1
Using virtio as a physical (wire-level) transport
...think something
like this has any hope, I'd rather not waste another month of my life.
If you can think of a solution that is likely to be "the right way", I'd
rather you told me before I implement any code.
Making my life harder since the last time I tried this, mainline commit
7c5e9ed0c (virtio_ring: remove a level of indirection) has removed the
possibility of using an alternative virtqueue implementation. The commit
message suggests that you might be willing to add this capability back.
Would this be an option?
Thanks for your time,
Ira