Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7c08f027".
2013 Jul 16
0
[LLVMdev] [LLVM Dev] [Discussion] Function-based parallel LLVM backend code generation
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ignoring FE time which can be fully parallelized and assuming 10%
>> compile time is spent in serial module passes, 25% time is spent in
>> CGSCC pass, the maximum speed up that can
2013 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVM Dev] [Discussion] Function-based parallel LLVM backend code generation
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Xinliang David Li <xinliangli at gmail.com>wrote:
> Ignoring FE time which can be fully parallelized and assuming 10%
> compile time is spent in serial module passes, 25% time is spent in
> CGSCC pass, the maximum speed up that can be gained by using function
> level parallelism is less than 3x. Even adding support for parallel
> compilation
2013 Jul 16
2
[LLVMdev] [LLVM Dev] [Discussion] Function-based parallel LLVM backend code generation
...-ftime-report in GCC?
>
We have the functionality... I thought we wired -ftime-report up to it? If
that doesn't work I'll have to go digging.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130716/7c08f027/attachment.html>