search for: 7bybdg

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7bybdg".

2018 Jan 10
0
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
...sing ULEB128 already.) > > I tried to implement this in LLVM, but couldn't find a good way to > represent the calls that must be omitted from the call site table. > > Is there a reason LLVM doesn't handle this like GCC? > > Examples: > - C++03: https://godbolt.org/g/7BYbdG > - C++11: https://godbolt.org/g/bnHLvH > See also my comment and Reid's reply here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-February/109995.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachment...
2018 Jan 06
2
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
...ll, assuming the call site table is using ULEB128 already.) I tried to implement this in LLVM, but couldn't find a good way to represent the calls that must be omitted from the call site table. Is there a reason LLVM doesn't handle this like GCC? Examples: - C++03: https://godbolt.org/g/7BYbdG - C++11: https://godbolt.org/g/bnHLvH Thanks, -Ryan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180105/932ff02a/attachment.html>
2018 Jan 11
1
LLVM EH tables much larger than GCC's
...>> I tried to implement this in LLVM, but couldn't find a good way to >> represent the calls that must be omitted from the call site table. >> >> Is there a reason LLVM doesn't handle this like GCC? >> >> Examples: >> - C++03: https://godbolt.org/g/7BYbdG >> - C++11: https://godbolt.org/g/bnHLvH >> > > See also my comment and Reid's reply here: > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-February/109995.html > Reid Kleckner wrote: > ... I would say that we should just > pattern match away our calls to std::te...