search for: 7b9db3ec

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7b9db3ec".

2012 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
Yes, I had about 133K hits for INST_PHI with a negative value, out of 136K hits of any "INST_.*" with a negative valued operand. Overall there were 474K INST_PHI and 12 million "INST_.*" in my tests. - Jan On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Rafael EspĂ­ndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > This looks good to me. > > Just one question, you found that
2012 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
On 10 October 2012 15:15, Jan Voung <jvoung at chromium.org> wrote: > Yes, I had about 133K hits for INST_PHI with a negative value, out of 136K > hits of any "INST_.*" with a negative valued operand. > > Overall there were 474K INST_PHI and 12 million "INST_.*" in my tests. Cool! Thanks again for working on this! > - Jan Cheers, Rafael
2012 Oct 11
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH / PROPOSAL] bitcode encoding that is ~15% smaller for large bitcode files...
...lion "INST_.*" in my tests. > > Cool! > > Thanks again for working on this! > > > - Jan > > Cheers, > Rafael > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121010/7b9db3ec/attachment.html>