search for: 7b7bd4e

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "7b7bd4e".

2010 Jul 27
3
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
...t; +    : X86AsmBackend(T) { >> +    HasAbsolutizedSet = true; >> +    HasScatteredSymbols = true; > > These probably should be false for Win32. What do they do? >> diff --git a/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..7b7bd4e >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >> +load_lib llvm.exp >> + >> +if { [llvm_supports_target X86] } { >> +  RunLLVMTests [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.{ll}]] >> +} > > This should be *.{s}. This has to...
2010 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
...mpute A - B. This is related to (1). These two things end up impacting relaxation and the assembler backend, which is why they unfortunately get exposed at this level. >>> diff --git a/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 0000000..7b7bd4e >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >>> +load_lib llvm.exp >>> + >>> +if { [llvm_supports_target X86] } { >>> +  RunLLVMTests [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.{ll}]] >>> +} >> &gt...
2010 Jul 30
2
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
...;s a bug in the path when these are false. Now that I know what these flags do, I'll try and figure out exactly what the problem is. - Michael Spencer >>>> diff --git a/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 0000000..7b7bd4e >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >>>> +load_lib llvm.exp >>>> + >>>> +if { [llvm_supports_target X86] } { >>>> +  RunLLVMTests [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.{ll}]]...
2010 Jul 26
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On 26 July 2010 18:08, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> > wrote: > > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- > > case Triple::Win32: > > + case Triple::Cygwin: > > + case Triple::MinGW32: > > return new
2010 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > You probably want to add Cygwin and MinGW32 Triples as well :- >    case Triple::Win32: > +  case Triple::Cygwin: > +  case Triple::MinGW32: >      return new WindowsX86AsmBackend (T); > Aaron Can someone test this on those platforms? That change would effect quite a few people. -
2010 Jul 30
0
[LLVMdev] Win32 COFF Support patch 5 (the final patch in the saga!)
...y your example without the scattered symbols bit, but with -mc-relax-all, does the resulting binary work? - Daniel > - Michael Spencer > >>>>> diff --git a/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>>>> new file mode 100644 >>>>> index 0000000..7b7bd4e >>>>> --- /dev/null >>>>> +++ b/test/MC/COFF/dg.exp >>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >>>>> +load_lib llvm.exp >>>>> + >>>>> +if { [llvm_supports_target X86] } { >>>>> +  RunLLVMTests [lsort [glob -nocompla...