search for: 79ba0fd6

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "79ba0fd6".

2019 May 24
2
Delinearization validity checks in DependenceAnalysis
...red "*char* A[2][2]"). The indirection operator (*) is only undefined if it yields to an access to an invalid address (C18, note 104). Michael -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190524/79ba0fd6/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: graycol.gif Type: image/gif Size: 105 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190524/79ba0fd6/attachment-0001.gif>
2019 May 22
2
Delinearization validity checks in DependenceAnalysis
Hello Yes, I agree that the SCEV cannot be simplified. Is my understanding correct that it is passed to a function like "isKnownNegative"? Which could still be able to prove is always true. The delinearisation may be valid, depending on exactly how you define delinearisation (under what conditions it should be giving results). It would be invalid for DA to return a dependency of [0