search for: 7905s

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "7905s".

Did you mean: 7905
2005 May 10
1
Group dial, first phone cannot pickup call. Cisco 7905 hangs.
...tone, nothing. Occasionally the handset will hang and need to be power-cycled. I've swapped out the phone, the power supply, and even the cabling, but no joy. As long as exten 1000 picks up the call at step one everything works fine. Apart from that everything else seems tickety-boo. Cisco 7905s with latest SIP build and Asterisk CVS-HEAD-03/02/05
2005 Jul 25
1
"Cannot native bridge" on licensed G729
Hi folks, In an effort to save bandwidth (our 7905s run over a WAN) we've switched from ulaw to g729a. We purchased 4 licenses from Digium (4 SIP clients, low call volume), and they seem to have been accepted: [codec_g729a.so] => (Annex A/B (floating point) G.729/PCM16 Codec Translator) == G.729 Host-ID: 07:53:aa:d3:e2:f2:bd:cc:27:60:9d:5...
2004 Jun 07
0
re: Voicemail and Cisco Phones
On my 7905s I can configure a "voicemail" number, which in turn activates a "Messages" softkey. When pressed, it goes to that exten, which in turn is configured to go to VoiceMailMain. Great, works like a charm. However, the phones also have a "go to voicemail timeout" after which...
2004 Jun 10
4
How to get the Called id with AGI
Hi all, Is there a way to get the "called id" (the B number) with AGI perl ? I know how to get the caller id which is working fine and is just below: #!/usr/bin/perl use Asterisk::AGI; $AGI = new Asterisk::AGI; my %input = $AGI->ReadParse(); $callerid = $input{'callerid'}; $AGI->say_digits($callerid); } Thanks in advance, Angel.
2004 May 22
14
Caller ID with BT CD50
Hi All, Having searched the archives, I can see there has been much discussion at various points regarding capture of caller id information from good old BT. If I understand correctly, it seems that not only do the drivers not currently support it, but my X101P possibly/probably can't do it anyway due to hardware? So, that leaves me with the modem route, which seems more and more unlikely,