search for: 78f24b29

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Charles Davis <cdavis at mymail.mines.edu>wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > >> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to >> stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that

On Jun 20, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that

...on to replace existing one, it was about unifying the way (libraries) dependencies are expressed in LLVM by cmake and configure/make. -- Jean-Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120621/78f24b29/attachment.html>