Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "786454".
Did you mean:
786445
2013 Apr 09
3
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
!{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32 5,
i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ] [fn_t] [line
5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to this check
in Deb...
2013 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>
> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32
> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>
> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createFunction, due to...
2014 Jan 10
3
[LLVMdev] Bitcode parsing performance
That was likely type information and should mostly be fixed up. It's still
not lazily loaded, but is going to be ridiculously smaller now.
-eric
On Fri Jan 10 2014 at 12:11:52 AM, Sean Silva <chisophugis at gmail.com> wrote:
> This Summer I was working on LTO and Rafael mentioned to me that debug
> info is not lazy loaded, which was the cause for the insane resource usage
> I
2014 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] Bitcode parsing performance
Adrian may have handled this recently?
On Jan 13, 2014 3:34 PM, "Manman Ren" <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote:
> I briefly looked at the bit code files and some types are not uniqued,
> here is one example:
> !3903 = metadata !{i32 786454, metadata !3904, null, metadata !"int64_t",
> i32 198, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata !2258} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
> [int64_t] [line 198, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from long int]
>
> !4019 = metadata !{i32 786454, metadata !4020, null, metadata !"int64_t",
>...
2013 Apr 10
2
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
Hi Eric,
On 10/04/13 00:20, Eric Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>>
>> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t", i32
>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>
>> as the function type parameter to DIBuilder::createF...
2013 Apr 16
2
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
...> On 10/04/13 00:20, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>>>>
>>>> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t",
>>>> i32
>>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
>>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>>
>>>> as...
2013 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
...ote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 10/04/13 00:20, Eric Christopher wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>>>
>>> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t",
>>> i32
>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>
>>> as the function type pa...
2013 Apr 16
0
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
...Eric Christopher wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>>>>>
>>>>> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t",
>>>>> i32
>>>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
>>>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>>>
>...
2012 May 18
5
Using XL toolstack (Xen) with DRBD
Hello,
Currently it seems that the drbd disk type with Xen''s XL toolstack (vs XM)
to get the automatic promotion/demotion behavior of drbd devices is not
supported. Is there something I can tweak with the block-drbd script to get
this to work?
Thanks,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
2013 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] Passing DW_TAG_typedef as the type to DIBuilder's createFunction
...>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:53 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi David, I'm seeing an assertion failure when passing this node
>>>>>>
>>>>>> !{i32 786454, metadata <badref>, metadata <badref>, metadata !"fn_t",
>>>>>> i32
>>>>>> 5, i64 0, i64 0, i64 0, i32 0, metadata <badref>} ; [ DW_TAG_typedef ]
>>>>>> [fn_t] [line 5, size 0, align 0, offset 0] [from ]
>>>&...