Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "77tb".
Did you mean:
771b
2017 Oct 27
5
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...1 to
server 2 just like I've been doing for the last decade. :(
If anyone can please help me understand where I might be going wrong it
would be absolutely wonderful!
Server 1:
Single E5-1620 v2
Ubuntu 14.04
glusterfs 3.10.5
16GB Ram
24 drive array on LSI raid
Sustained >1.5GB/s to XFS (77TB)
Server 2:
Single E5-2620 v3
Ubuntu 16.04
glusterfs 3.10.5
32GB Ram
36 drive array on LSI raid
Sustained >2.5GB/s to XFS (164TB)
Speed tests are done with local with single thread (dd) or 4 threads
(iozone) using my standard 64k io size to 20G or 5G files (20G for local
drives, 5G for gluste...
2017 Oct 30
0
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...e last decade. :(
>
> If anyone can please help me understand where I might be going wrong it
> would be absolutely wonderful!
>
> Server 1:
> Single E5-1620 v2
> Ubuntu 14.04
> glusterfs 3.10.5
> 16GB Ram
> 24 drive array on LSI raid
> Sustained >1.5GB/s to XFS (77TB)
>
> Server 2:
> Single E5-2620 v3
> Ubuntu 16.04
> glusterfs 3.10.5
> 32GB Ram
> 36 drive array on LSI raid
> Sustained >2.5GB/s to XFS (164TB)
>
> Speed tests are done with local with single thread (dd) or 4 threads
> (iozone) using my standard 64k io size to 2...
2017 Oct 27
0
Poor gluster performance on large files.
...he last decade. :(
>
> If anyone can please help me understand where I might be going wrong it would be absolutely wonderful!
>
> Server 1:
> Single E5-1620 v2
> Ubuntu 14.04
> glusterfs 3.10.5
> 16GB Ram
> 24 drive array on LSI raid
> Sustained >1.5GB/s to XFS (77TB)
>
> Server 2:
> Single E5-2620 v3
> Ubuntu 16.04
> glusterfs 3.10.5
> 32GB Ram
> 36 drive array on LSI raid
> Sustained >2.5GB/s to XFS (164TB)
>
> Speed tests are done with local with single thread (dd) or 4 threads (iozone) using my standard 64k io size to 20...