search for: 77mb

...When I compile it into an .o file: $ clang -c test.ll $ objdump -t test.o test.o: file format elf64-x86-64 SYMBOL TABLE: 0000000000000000 l df *ABS* 0000000000000000 test.ll 0000000000000000 l O .data 0000000004c4b400 vals LLVM puts the global in the .data section, and results in a 77MB .o file of mostly zeroes. Why does this variable not go in the .bss section? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170423/db0314d5/attachment.html>

...d any tools that dynamically load the llvm/clang .dlls I find this Windows deficiency rather odd, since the OS X package is complete for tool developers. I've worked around this issue by building llvm/clang on Windows myself and running CPack to produce a complete NSIS package (weighing in at ~77MB). Is there a motivation behind the stripping of this package against tool developers? I'd like users to clone my tool source and build it quickly without building llvm in its entirety. This issue isn't critical, just a curiosity I have. Thanks! -Jacko

...VMAnalysis.a libLLVMTarget.a libLLVMTransformUtils.a libLLVMipa.a libLLVMAnalysis.a libLLVMTarget.a libLLVMTransformUtils.a libLLVMipa.a LLVMCore.o libLLVMSupport.a libLLVMSystem.a LLVMbzip2.o Somewhat better is when I use "--libs engine asmparser". It works, and generates an exe around 77Mb. And no complaints when linking. thanks for your help Oscar. Simon. -- Simon Burton, B.Sc. Licensed PO Box 8066 ANU Canberra 2601 Australia Ph. 61 02 6249 6940 http://arrowtheory.com

...t;efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 4/23/2017 10:10 AM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev wrote: > >> Here is a module: >> >> @vals = internal unnamed_addr global [20000000 x i32] undef, align 4 >> >> LLVM puts the global in the .data section, and results in a 77MB .o file >> of mostly zeroes. Why does this variable not go in the .bss section? >> >> > I think it's just an oversight; it doesn't matter for clang because it > never emits globals like that. See TargetLoweringObjectFile::getKindForGlobal > for the relevant logic...

Hello everybody, I know there are many HOWTOs out there about installing IE6, but none seem to mention the problem I have. The installation of IE6 doesn't go beyond the window: "Setup was unable to download the required components. Please make sure you are connected to the internet or try to run Setup later again" Trying to set wininet to "native" or "builtin"

The clonezilla live project is a really nice way to do image-copies of machines: http://clonezilla.sourceforge.net/clonezilla-live/ but it's based on a Debian live OS which has some unfamiliar quirks. Has anyone built something like this on a Centos base? For anyone who hasn't seen it, it can do whole disk or partition copies of windows and most Linux filesystems and it knows enough to

Simon Burton <simon at arrowtheory.com> writes: >> There are several possibilities here: either add1 is assigned a NULL >> pointer, or LLVM was unable to use the JIT and generates bytecode >> instead of native code, or invalid native code was generated >> (unlikely). > > Well, it's not NULL: > > (gdb) print add1 > $1 = (int (*)(int)) 0x83e43b8 >

On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 03:25:39 +0200 Oscar Fuentes <oscarfv at telefonica.net> wrote: ... > Simon, > > With a fresh CVS checkout, I've tried your test case on Windows/VC++ > and it works ok. Too bad that I have not access to a Linux machine > right now. I'll like to see what's wrong with your test case. > > What you get from running the test case under gdb

...t;> *remus --no-net 2 192.168.36.233* >> >> >> Had 0 unexplained entries in p2m table >> 1: sent 32377, skipped 391, delta 14193ms, dom0 11%, target 0%, sent >> 74Mb/s, dirtied 1Mb/s 517 pages >> 2: sent 517, skipped 0, delta 219ms, dom0 11%, target 0%, sent 77Mb/s, >> dirtied 0Mb/s 0 pages >> 3: sent 0, skipped 0, Start last iteration >> PROF: suspending at 1311824828.327395 >> domain 2 not shut down >> ERROR Internal error: Suspend request failed >> ERROR Internal error: Domain appears not to have suspended >> Sa...

I already tried 512MB but re-try again now and results are the same. Both without tuning; Stripe 2 replica 2: dd performs 250~ mb/s but shard gives 77mb. I attached two logs (shard and stripe logs) Note: I also noticed that you said ?order?. Do you mean when we create via volume set we have to make an order for bricks? I thought gluster handles (and do the math) itself. Gencer From: Krutika Dhananjay [mailto:kdhananj at redhat.com]...

Hi Krutika, Sure, here is volume info: root at sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/# gluster volume info testvol Volume Name: testvol Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: 30426017-59d5-4091-b6bc-279a905b704a Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 10 x 2 = 20 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/bricks/brick1 Brick2: sr-09-loc-50-14-18:/bricks/brick2 Brick3:

Guys, I've heard about some absurd RAM requirements for 9.1, has anybody tested it? e.g. http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=36314 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/9-1-minimal-ram-requirements-tp5771583.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.