Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "77e58059".
Did you mean:
7705859
2015 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] Should llvm include a linker?
...> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150129/77e58059/attachment.html>
2015 Jan 29
2
[LLVMdev] Should llvm include a linker?
I've been thinking about how easy it would be to integrate lld into
the main llvm repo:
1) Preserve history with: `svnadmin load --parent-dir tools/lld . < lld.dump`
2) Move lld's target-specific libraries up to `lib/Target`, and
remaining libraries up to `lib`.
3) Move everything from the lld namespace to the llvm namespace.
But would it be valuable? I'd think that non-C,