search for: 7792

Here's a patch that should make predict.glm(..., type="response") retain the names. The change passes make check on our Opteron running SLES9. One simple test is: names(predict(glm(y ~ x, family=binomial, data=data.frame(y=c(1, 0, 1, 0), x=c(1, 1, 0, 0))), newdata=data.frame(x=c(0, 0.5, 1)), type="response")) which gives [1]

<snip> Replaces: pickup-9582-c0a80101-d-4 at 192.168.101.102 <snip> This Replaces header refers to RFC3891 which is not yet supported in Asterisk (see http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SLA) This INVITE fails with : <snip> chan_sip.c: Trying to pick up 7792 at subs <snip> app_directed_pickup.c: No target channel found for 7792. If I'm dialing *87792 instead of using BLF, then I'm entering the dialplan part in which there is Pickup(${EXTEN:2}@PICKUPMARK) and the call is correctly pickup. So my understanding is : when upgrading from 1...

...h Altiware server. PRI appears to be okay. It keeps trying to move my call to a different channel...usually channel 1. This is the deal here: Moving call from channel 23 to channel 1 Then the following errors after no audio then hanging up manually: Mar 24 17:46:17 WARNING[1315]: chan_zap.c:7792 pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found? Mar 24 17:46:17 WARNING[1315]: chan_zap.c:8874 pri_dchannel: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Using asterisk 1.2.5, zaptel 1.2.4, and libpri 1.2.2 as they are the current stable releases. I've tried changing the timing sources around. I...

is it possible and how difficult is it, to use LDAP for all the user accounts and groups and password management? would this be something you would want to do? or is it better to stick with samba's initila way of dealing with users? Caleb O'Connell caleb@lincoln.midcoast.com (207)882-7792

...> > http://bugs.winehq.org/ > > > > -- > > Benjamin Arai > > http://www.benjaminarai.com > -- > Marcelo A. Luda > Direcci?n de Sistemas > Municipio de Mor?n > Tel: 4489-7855/7792 > > > > > -- > Benjamin Arai > http://www.benjaminarai.com

Hello, I'm using Thomson/Technicolor ST2030S hardphones with Asterisk 1.6. Changing from 1.6.1.18 to 1.6.2.6, I can see a change in Pickup's behaviour and I'm a bit confused about it. With 1.6.2.6, when extension 7791 is calling extension 7792, I can see INVITE messages coming in and out Asterisk. I can also see a NOTIFY message advertising this call to subscriber 7793, for instance. Here is an extract of this message : NOTIFY sip:7793 at 192.168.101.102:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 <snip> Call-ID: 7019-c0a80101-d-3 at 192.168.101.102...

...m here with: [root at ablprx01 squid]# cat /etc/*release CentOS release 5.2 (Final) [root at ablprx01 squid]# rpm -qa|grep -i squid squid-2.6.STABLE6-5.el5_1.3 The web proxy process (used by 300-400 users) seems to run ok: [root at ablprx01 squid]# ps uawwwx|grep squid root 2304 0.0 0.0 7792 1268 ? Ss 08:45 0:00 squid -D squid 3082 27.7 0.9 46912 37068 ? R 10:21 32:18 (squid) -D squid 3083 0.0 0.0 1508 232 ? Ss 10:21 0:00 (unlinkd) [root at ablprx01 squid]# netstat -an|grep LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0...

Hi, im little bit confused about Cohen's Kappa and i should be look into the Kappa function code. Is the easy formula really wrong? kappa=agreement-chance/(1-chance) many thanks christian ############################################################################### true-negativ:7445 false-positive:3410 false-negativ:347 true-positiv:772 classification-aggrement:68,6%

...06 8928 9137 10017 10826 11317 10744 9713 9938 9161 8927 1974 7750 6981 8038 8422 8714 9512 10120 9823 8743 9129 8710 8680 1975 8162 7306 8124 7870 9387 9556 10093 9620 8285 8466 8160 8034 1976 7717 7461 7767 7925 8623 8945 10078 9179 8037 8488 7874 8647 1977 7792 6957 7726 8106 8890 9299 10625 9302 8314 8850 8265 8796 1978 7836 6892 7791 8192 9115 9434 10484 9827 9110 9070 8633 9240 > dat1<-as.data.frame(USAccDeaths) > summary(dat1) x Min. : 6892 1st Qu.: 8089 Median : 8728 Mean : 8789 3rd Qu.:...

................... configure:7694: gcc -c -g -I/usr/local/include conftest.m >&5 gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1obj': execvp: No such file or directory configure:7700: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ ....................... configure:7739: result: no configure:7792: gcc -c -I/usr/local/include conftest.m >&5 gcc: error trying to exec 'cc1obj': execvp: No such file or directory configure:7798: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: | /* confdefs.h. */ ...................... configure:41100: gcc -m64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -mminimal-toc -fno-opt...

...12:13 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/sbin/safe_asterisk -U asterisk -G asterisk asterisk 3846 1.1 0.2 21388 8072 pts/1 Sl 12:13 0:00 /usr/sbin/asterisk -f -U asterisk -G asterisk -vvvg -c if i start it by just typing asterisk at the command line i just get this root 3793 2.5 0.2 21376 7792 ? Ssl 12:12 0:00 asterisk i am guessing the script starts it up right but why is it not starting automatically? _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go...

Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > > Duncan Sands wrote: > > > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable > > > (and shows the problem). > > > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some > >

My name is Marcelo Luda, I'm new to the list. I'm from Argentina and in the place where I work we ara planing to migrate to linux, but only if we can manage to run all the software we now use in windows. Obisuly, we are trying with Wine :-) Most of the app I need to run use MS RDO . We managed to install sussefully RDO and MSODBC but the apps crash when they try to use it. I attached a

...Tenovis PBX -> traditional phone) doesn't work at all. I get the following messages: --- -- Executing Dial("SIP/8403-5b0f", "Zap/g1/1311") in new stack -- Requested transfer capability: 0x00 - SPEECH -- Called g1/1311 Mar 31 12:45:34 WARNING[23193]: chan_zap.c:7792 pri_fixup_principle: Call specified, but not found? Mar 31 12:45:34 WARNING[23193]: chan_zap.c:9046 pri_dchannel: Unable to move channel 1! Don't know what to do if second ROSE component is of type 0x6 XXX Invalid Progress indicator value received: 14 -- Zap/1-1 is ringing Don't know wh...

...sting translations have been revised and expanded, and French and Korean have been added. The Windows installer supports a wide range of languages for installation. BUG FIXES o lm(qr=FALSE) now works. o predict.glm() not longer loses names for "response" predictions. (PR#7792) o Typo in menu(graphics=TRUE) meant it failed on Unix if tcltk was not available. o When names.dist() was removed, the result of cmdscale() lost its rownames. The example also lost the labels. o R CMD check assumed 'tar' was GNU tar and so supported -z. o read.table(...

...sting translations have been revised and expanded, and French and Korean have been added. The Windows installer supports a wide range of languages for installation. BUG FIXES o lm(qr=FALSE) now works. o predict.glm() not longer loses names for "response" predictions. (PR#7792) o Typo in menu(graphics=TRUE) meant it failed on Unix if tcltk was not available. o When names.dist() was removed, the result of cmdscale() lost its rownames. The example also lost the labels. o R CMD check assumed 'tar' was GNU tar and so supported -z. o read.table(...

Our users are experiencing some unacceptable delay when trying to have a conversation. The delay is so noticeable that they keep stepping on each others words and resort to calling the customers via cell phone. Here is the setup SDSL Connection (PPPoA) Speedtouch 610 SDSL Modem 3Com 2224PWR Plus Switch (phones on separate VLAN) 8 Cisco 796 Phones All connecting to a remote Asterisk Server. We

Here's a version that doesn't try to do block deletion on it's own. If you use -adce then -simplifycfg, you get what you want. It passes all tests except one, which is that we delete an invoke of a pure function, IE Transforms/ADCE/dce_pure_invoke.ll - I'm not sure why that's bad. The reason we delete it is because it returns false to I.mayHaveSideEffects(), and in particular,

...ello World +7696 => Hello World +7704 => Hello World +7712 => Hello World +7720 => Hello World +7728 => Hello World +7736 => Hello World +7744 => Hello World +7752 => Hello World +7760 => Hello World +7768 => Hello World +7776 => Hello World +7784 => Hello World +7792 => Hello World +7800 => Hello World +7808 => Hello World +7816 => Hello World +7824 => Hello World +7832 => Hello World +7840 => Hello World +7848 => Hello World +7856 => Hello World +7864 => Hello World +7872 => Hello World +7880 => Hello World +7888 => Hello...

...+7680: 0, 0 +7688: , +7688: 0, 0 +7696: , +7696: 0, 0 +7704: , +7704: 0, 0 +7712: , +7712: 0, 0 +7720: , +7720: 0, 0 +7728: , +7728: 0, 0 +7736: , +7736: 0, 0 +7744: , +7744: 0, 0 +7752: , +7752: 0, 0 +7760: , +7760: 0, 0 +7768: , +7768: 0, 0 +7776: , +7776: 0, 0 +7784: , +7784: 0, 0 +7792: , +7792: 0, 0 +7800: , +7800: 0, 0 +7808: , +7808: 0, 0 +7816: , +7816: 0, 0 +7824: , +7824: 0, 0 +7832: , +7832: 0, 0 +7840: , +7840: 0, 0 +7848: , +7848: 0, 0 +7856: , +7856: 0, 0 +7864: , +7864: 0, 0 +7872: , +7872: 0, 0 +7880: , +7880: 0, 0 +7888: , +7888: 0, 0 +7896: , +7896: 0,...