Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "7705301".
2010 Apr 19
2
[LLVMdev] Living on Clang
...6 2010-04-19 04:41 FileCheck
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 6374 2010-04-19 04:41 count
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 122992 2010-04-19 04:41 not
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 24101 2010-04-19 05:34 llvm-config
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 18325933 2010-04-19 05:36 opt
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 7705301 2010-04-19 05:36 llvm-as
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 6671138 2010-04-19 05:36 llvm-dis
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 31626605 2010-04-19 05:37 llvm-mc
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 32630459 2010-04-19 05:38 llc
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcuco 6814656 2010-04-19 05:38 llvm-ranlib
-rwxrwxr-x. 1 elcuco elcu...
2010 Apr 15
0
[LLVMdev] Living on Clang
> We want to make Clang great, and we need your help!
Doug,
I don't see any type of selfbuild target in the LLVM top level makefile.
This would be a useful way to automate the self build process.
I've used similar mechanisms before on other compilers, where you can
trivially invoke a three phase build (first you do a full build with your
system compiler, then you use your built
2010 Apr 14
12
[LLVMdev] Living on Clang
Hello fellow LLVMers and Clangstas,
We want to make Clang great, and we need your help!
Helping is easy: just build Clang on your platform and start using it as your main compiler for LLVM and Clang development. Much of the Clang team has been living on Clang for at least several weeks already, and we've found it to be quite stable for development. If you run into problems---poor