search for: 76l

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 55 matches for "76l".

Did you mean: 76
2011 Nov 10
2
plotting a function with given formula in ggplot2
Hi All, I have a scatter plot produced using ggplot2 and I want to add the regression line to this scatter plot. I suppose I can use geom_smooth() to do this, but for the sake of learning ( I am new both to R and ggplot2), I want to try and add it as a function (something that curve() does in the standard R plotting). I did some search and found that stat_function() can be used for this. But
2012 Nov 14
2
aggrete data from combination
...52L, 52L, 53L, 53L, 53L, 54L, 54L, 54L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 56L, 57L, 57L, 57L, 58L, 58L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 60L, 60L, 61L, 61L, 62L, 62L, 63L, 63L, 64L, 64L, 64L, 65L, 65L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 69L, 69L, 70L, 70L, 71L, 71L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 79L, 79L, 80L, 80L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 84L, 85L, 85L, 85L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 89L, 89L, 90L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 92L, 93L, 93L, 94L, 95L, 95L, 95L, 95L, 96L, 96L, 96L, 97L, 97L, 98L, 98L, 98L, 98L, 99L...
2016 Apr 22
1
Unique Ordering
..."missed", "steal"), class = "factor"), Var2 = structure(c(89L, 89L, 89L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 86L, 86L, 86L, 85L, 85L, 85L, 84L, 84L, 84L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 80L, 80L, 80L, 79L, 79L, 79L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 77L, 77L, 77L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 72L, 72L, 72L, 71L, 71L, 71L, 70L, 70L, 70L, 69L, 69L, 69L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 65L, 65L, 65L, 64L, 64L, 64L, 63L, 63L, 63L, 62L, 62L, 62L, 61L, 61L, 61L, 60L, 60L, 60L, 59L, 59L, 59L, 58L, 58L, 58L...
2012 Jul 14
2
Arrange two columns into a five variable dataframe
...College of the Redwoods > dput(flies) structure(list(long = c(40L, 37L, 44L, 47L, 47L, 47L, 68L, 47L, 54L, 61L, 71L, 75L, 89L, 58L, 59L, 62L, 79L, 96L, 58L, 62L, 70L, 72L, 74L, 96L, 75L, 46L, 42L, 65L, 46L, 58L, 42L, 48L, 58L, 50L, 80L, 63L, 65L, 70L, 70L, 72L, 97L, 46L, 56L, 70L, 70L, 72L, 76L, 90L, 76L, 92L, 21L, 40L, 44L, 54L, 36L, 40L, 56L, 60L, 48L, 53L, 60L, 60L, 65L, 68L, 60L, 81L, 81L, 48L, 48L, 56L, 68L, 75L, 81L, 48L, 68L, 35L, 37L, 49L, 46L, 63L, 39L, 46L, 56L, 63L, 65L, 56L, 65L, 70L, 63L, 65L, 70L, 77L, 81L, 86L, 70L, 70L, 77L, 77L, 81L, 77L, 16L, 19L, 19L, 32L, 33L, 33L...
2010 Apr 19
1
What is mclust up to? Different clusters found if x and y interchanged
...4.5, 4.6, 4.5, 4.6, 3.9, 4.2, 4.9, 4.9, 4.5, 16.7, 17.4, 17.5, 17.5, 17.4, 1.9, 2.4, 1.7, 1.2, 1.5, 1.1, 1.8, 3.1, 3.1, 3, 4.1, 4.2, 2.7, 4.5, 0.4, 1.2, 3, 3.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.9, 2, -0.8, 5.8, 0.6, 1, 0.9, 4.4, 2.3, -0.1), dD = c(-66L, -81L, -81L, -71L, -68L, -79L, -73L, -77L, -74L, -71L, -73L, -80L, -76L, -80L, -74L, -77L, -74L, -77L, -74L, -82L, -79L, -72L, -74L, -71L, -76L, -72L, -76L, -73L, -75L, -78L, -81L, -77L, -77L, -73L, -79L, -104L, -98L, -98L, -109L, -106L, -99L, -107L, -100L, -98L, -95L, -95L, -95L, -97L, -98L, -121L, -119L, -118L, -121L, -121L, -106L, -116L, -122L, -112L, -125L, -109L,...
2010 Sep 06
3
Finding the two most recent dates
...4784, 14784, 14784, 14784, 14784 ), class = "Date"), bp_date = structure(c(12660, 14571, 13392, 13080, 12012, 13080, 13894, 14622, 12654, 13894), class = "Date"), SBP = c(135L, 160L, 135L, 153L, 150L, 153L, 151L, 126L, 150L, 151L), DBP = c(85L, 80L, NA, 79L, 82L, 79L, 76L, 60L, 82L, 91L)), .Names = c("prochi", "date_1st_event", "bp_date", "SBP", "DBP"), row.names = 108:117, class = "data.frame") It consists of repeated measures for the same individual. What I want to do is find the two most recent b...
2010 Sep 05
2
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
...385<kill> 44L %reg16388<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tEOR %reg16388, %reg16387<kill>, pred:14, pred:%reg0 56L %reg16389<def> = COPY %reg16384<kill> 64L %reg16389<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tEOR %reg16389, %reg16386<kill>, pred:14, pred:%reg0 76L %reg16390<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tMOVi8 18, pred:14, pred:%reg0 88L %reg16391<def> = COPY %reg16390<kill> 96L %reg16391<def>, %CPSR<def,dead> = tEOR %reg16391, %reg16389<kill>, pred:14, pred:%reg0 108L %R0<def> = COPY %reg16391<kill...
2016 Apr 15
0
aggregate combination data
...1L, 61L, 62L, 62L, 63L, 63L, 64L, 64L, >>>>>>>>> 64L, 65L, 65L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 69L, >>>>>>>>> 69L, 70L, 70L, 71L, 71L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 74L, >>>>>>>>> 75L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 79L, 79L, >>>>>>>>> 80L, 80L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 84L, >>>>>>>>> 85L, 85L, 85L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 88L, >>>>>>>>> 89L, 89L, 90L, 91...
2010 Sep 05
0
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > >> I've noticed this pattern happening with other operators aswell, but used xor in this example. As i said before, i tried with different register allocation orders, but it will produce always the same result. GCC is emitting longer
2011 Jul 01
2
Initiating in BNArray
...16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 20L, 21L, 22L, 23L, 24L, 25L, 26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 41L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 51L, 52L, 53L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 57L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 61L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, 66L, 67L, 68L, 69L, 70L, 71L, 72L, 73L, 74L, 75L, 76L, 77L, 78L, 79L, 80L, 81L, 82L, 83L, 84L, 85L, 86L, 87L, 88L, 89L, 90L, 91L, 92L, 93L, 94L, 95L, 96L, 97L, 98L, 99L, 100L, 101L, 102L, 103L, 104L, 105L, 106L, 107L, 108L, 109L, 110L, 111L, 112L, 113L, 114L, 115L, 116L, ...... ...... ..... V2 = structure(c(278L, 23L, 11L, 169L, 14L, 86L, 94L, 51L,...
2008 Jul 06
2
lattice question
...L, 71L, 71L, 77L, 72L, 63L, 77L, 83L, 63L, 68L, 83L, 71L, 81L, 73L, 70L, 81L, 91L, 91L, 78L, 93L, 75L, 71L, 64L, 62L, 51L, 56L, 47L, 51L, 93L, 66L, 74L, 67L, 70L, 66L, 71L, 60L, 71L, 79L, 73L, 96L, 81L, 89L, 54L, 63L, 52L, 48L, 48L, 57L, 69L, 101L, 109L, 89L, 74L, 96L, 97L, 96L, 92L, 84L, 88L, 82L, 76L, 78L, 88L, 76L, 69L, 83L, 84L, 79L, 76L, 62L, 58L, 79L, 83L, 94L, 95L, 113L, 107L, 53L, 45L, 34L, 39L, 42L, 38L, 34L, 41L, 28L, 30L, 36L, 48L, 35L, 28L, 31L, 29L, 45L, 45L, 45L, 48L, 39L, 52L, 43L, 41L, 42L, 44L, 38L, 44L, 24L, 26L, 22L, 12L, 13L, 17L, 20L, 28L, 28L, 32L, 25L, 25L, 35L, 28L, 24L, 2...
2010 Sep 04
3
[LLVMdev] Possible missed optimization?
On Sep 4, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Borja Ferrer wrote: > I've noticed this pattern happening with other operators aswell, but used xor in this example. As i said before, i tried with different register allocation orders, but it will produce always the same result. GCC is emitting longer code, but since LLVM is so nearer to the optimal code sequence i wanted to reach it. In LLVM, copies are
2011 Oct 05
1
Dealing with proportions
...quot;F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K"), class = "factor"), Yes = c(18L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 44L, 27L, 2L, 15L, 13L, 3L, 34L), No = c(171L, 11L, 5L, 8L, 146L, 80L, 5L, 30L, 22L, 5L, 42L), Num = c(189L, 13L, 6L, 10L, 190L, 107L, 7L, 45L, 35L, 8L, 76L)), .Names = c("Case", "Yes", "No", "Num"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -11L)) Thanks in advance Sam
2008 Sep 26
2
Date Time conversion
...oing wrong? chron(as.character(f), format=c(dates="%m/%d/%y", times="%h:%m")) f <- structure(c(51L, 60L, 66L, 87L, 90L, 115L, 23L, 35L, 37L, 6L, 12L, 55L, 84L, 96L, 109L, 17L, 29L, 41L, 3L, 74L, 94L, 102L, 30L, 8L, 46L, 69L, 107L, 15L, 25L, 39L, 1L, 71L, 95L, 19L, 56L, 62L, 76L, 85L, 99L, 111L, 42L, 4L, 52L, 61L, 67L, 91L, 13L, 24L, 36L, 38L, 7L, 81L, 82L, 57L, 64L, 100L, 113L, 21L, 33L, 44L, 78L, 54L, 73L, 83L, 108L, 16L, 28L, 2L, 58L, 65L, 86L, 101L, 32L, 43L, 77L, 93L, 104L, 10L, 48L, 53L, 97L, 110L, 18L, 27L, 75L, 92L, 103L, 31L, 9L, 47L, 70L, 72L, 106L, 14L, 26L, 40L...
2012 Nov 14
5
aggregate combination data
Dear R users, I want to aggregate all *d *data from all combination of n *plots* taken by k. Thank very much! My data is like that: plot d 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 14 1 18 1 20 1 21 1 43 1 108 1 43 2 41 2 61 2 83 2 61 2 84 2 45 2 21 2 12 2 11 ... 100 10 100 12 -- --- Catalin-Constantin ROIBU Forestry engineer, PhD Forestry Faculty of Suceava
2012 Sep 10
4
Identifying duplicate rows?
Hi, I am trying to identify duplicate values in a column in a date frame. The duplicated function identifies the duplicate rows in the data frame but it only does this for the second record, not both records. Is there a way to mark both rows in the data frame as TRUE? dfA$dups<-duplicated(dfA$Value) dfA Site State Value dups 929 VA 73 FALSE 929 VA 73 TRUE 930 VA 76 FALSE 930 VA 76 TRUE 931
2013 Feb 27
2
matrix multiplication
...? 388L, 415L, 256L, 312L, 446L, 45L, 162L, 485L, 154L, 55L, 153L,? 137L, 290L, 93L, 40L, 110L, 167L, 315L, 266L, 317L, 314L, 264L,? 277L, 488L, 28L, 354L, 303L, 490L, 192L, 432L, 228L, 222L, 418L,? 323L, 244L, 239L, 193L, 120L, 116L, 148L, 57L, 246L, 300L, 143L,? 208L, 400L, 78L, 273L, 411L, 401L, 476L, 262L, 159L, 195L, 102L,? 75L, 136L, 402L, 32L, 199L, 286L, 477L, 54L, 429L, 80L, 316L,? 30L, 333L, 387L, 452L, 324L, 456L, 39L, 138L, 113L, 448L, 377L,? 122L, 441L, 396L, 454L, 497L, 161L, 21L, 117L, 413L, 94L, 459L,? 156L, 365L, 322L, 397L, 88L, 207L, 150L, 209L, 184L, 378L, 217L,? 176L, 52L, 374...
2014 Sep 01
1
Correlation Matrix with a Covariate
...0, 31, 24, 16.842105, 15.789474, 25, 26, 30, 23, 29, 10, 22, 16, 29, 30, 27, 24 ), ext_t = c(193L, 374L, 127L, 181L, 198L, 112L, 208L, 194L, 185L, 224L, 275L, 204L, 235L, 257L, 149L, 279L, 320L, 322L, 188L, 220L, 273L, 206L, 129L, 296L, 223L, 277L, 156L, 195L, 219L, 155L, 167L, 176L, 220L, 227L, 224L, 195L, 150L, 277L, 134L, 285L, 255L, 225L, 176L), total_barrat_11_imputed = c(52, 49.65517241, 49, 50, 59, 33, 80, 59, 49, 88.96551724, 46, 69, 55, 61, 55, 81, 63, 78, 63, 77, 74, 56, 66, 65, 64, 80, 47, 41, 55, 61, 69, 65, 54, 60, 75, 48, 55, 92, 55, 80, 61, 7...
2012 Jul 12
4
Adjusting format of boxplot
Hi, I managed to use the attached data set and figure out the following: flies <- read.table("example12_1.dat",header=TRUE,sep="\t") boxplot(long ~ group, data = flies, horizontal = TRUE, col = "red") I'm very new to R and would like some help with the following: 1. Change the order on the y-axis from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 to 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
2008 Aug 26
2
lattice plotting character woes
The following reproducable code shows the setting of my problem: set.seed(260808) n = 50 x = rnorm(n) y = rnorm(n) z = ceiling(runif(n,0,4)) g = runif(n,0,6) G = factor(ceiling(g)) xyplot(y ~ x | G) plsy <- trellis.par.get("plot.symbol") plsy$pch = z trellis.par.set("plot.symbol",plsy) xyplot(y ~ x | G) plsy$pch = as.character(z)