Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "76b1852c".
2018 Mar 21
2
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
...eers,
>Rafael
Ok. Should we give an error when .note.gnu.property section is in the object??
?Best regards,
George | Developer | Access Softek, Inc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180321/76b1852c/attachment.html>
2018 Mar 20
0
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
I think we should wait until there is someone wanting to use these features with lld.
Cheers,
Rafael
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On March 20, 2018 6:59 AM, George Rimar <grimar at accesssoftek.com> wrote:
> Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program
> property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time
2018 Mar 20
3
[LLD/ELF] - Should we implement .note.gnu.property and/or Intel CET in LLD ?
Linux GABI [1] introduced new .note.gnu.property section which contains a program
property note which describes special handling requirements for linker and run-time loader.
LLD does not support .note.gnu.property yet.
GABI specifies 2 types of entries:
GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE and GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED:
* GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE: Its pr_data field contains an integer in the format