search for: 767adc6d

Oh I just see that there were already a bunch of answers. I missed the thread, sorry. So basically my intuitive approach on this is close to what I perceive Peter's position is: - don't create a new format if there is already one. - if you really have a good reason to create a new format, it should replace the existing one (i.e. don't maintain two). - ideally we should be able to

...If it is non-trivial to adapt llvm-as, then sure: but you could also have the YAML format printed in a comment which should allow this right? -- Mehdi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170603/767adc6d/attachment.html>