search for: 7632a0d6

Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7632a0d6".

2012 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?
...from source - You can't wrap certain parts of it (operator new, delete, a few other things) - You can't re-use any C libraries (zlib for example) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120621/7632a0d6/attachment.html>
2012 Jun 21
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code?
Can we alter the build system so that when building a run-time library it modifies all .cpp files like this: namespace FOO { <file body> } This will give us essentially the same thing, but w/o system dependent object file hackery. Maybe we can add a Clang flag to add such a namespace for us? (This approach, as well as Chandler's original approach will have to deal with malloc,