Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "76223".
Did you mean:
75223
2019 Feb 28
3
Making LLD PDB generation faster
...or fetches) will be found on the first cacheline accessed, for any given Type record inserted.
1
177774132
86.324%
2
20133777
9.777%
3
4046867
1.965%
4
1506067
0.731%
5
829202
0.403%
6
533119
0.259%
7
348794
0.169%
8
233626
0.113%
9
159738
0.078%
10
110651
0.054%
11
76223
0.037%
12
53601
0.026%
13
37271
0.018%
14
26666
0.013%
15
19013
0.009%
16
13591
0.007%
17
9667
0.005%
18
7024
0.003%
19
5102
0.002%
20
3780
0.002%
21
2767
0.001%
22
2003
0.001%
23
1423
0.001%
24
1041
0.001%
25
780
0.000%
26
565
0.000%
27
411
0.000%...
2019 Feb 27
4
Making LLD PDB generation faster
This could be ICF. There were lots of issues with ICF on ARM64, but they
are not inherently ARM64-specific, they just come up there more often. See
https://reviews.llvm.org/D56986 which fixes that.
Easiest thing is always to profile or add /time to see what's slow.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 6:30 AM Leonardo Santagada <santagada at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Anyone would know why lld takes