search for: 75x

Hi - I upgraded to Ferret 0.11.3 from 0.10.13. I used to index 10,000 records in 10 secs. Now it takes 13 minutes. (That''s a factor of ~75x) Did something change in the flush semantics, or something? Thanks! Schnitz -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ferret-talk/attachments/20070304/5fa79f23/attachment-0001.html

...1 - my app server mounts /data/export on /home app2 - ditto The appropriate conf files are attached. My simple test involves reading an input file and writing it to the Gluster home versus local /tmp. These tests were conducted using standard log files produced by our application. Writing is 75x-ish slower. Reading is 15x-ish slower. Now, obviously, there's some overhead with regards to the Gluster system, and while the overall numbers themselves aren't bad in the real world, I'm wondering what, if any, performance tweaks I could be using to help this out. I don't think a 7...

...FJWTN*\ Z1H2HM)E6)R7^N[''`JQ9=:()<";9^&1V38:K7]:@X0(QH8?%QO>BW_*OLC#OZ ZT]]IB=?^@/YV1MFB*B7HM7BT>/+(?`3?27/<''!%_3JT2^=Q]540_3<<)JTU8 ZG<.)/1UQ0B3CVGE^+%Z3<YBW+=O%JP[NJ>)64YW<3(E_8<96.7%.4[Y#2ZGY ZH>A`P5,2!0[Z\08+3NB4]7V!1CZ.8ZO.L\!]XT<75X=GL4G:.U26GJ_:=S.7 Z<(\1W3*?V6\)FQ1ZJ*HTR_\D+8B=<D3202K3YY#RZD*Y=4?/Y;F^^3,8#&B- ZRS\IV.:U=0<_[84>HAY]6G<LJKL#AD+R6!Q;6<MSA@B3D+6P.E"Z.QIE_%Q> ZAX:1L5J''"^-081*U9T_7">J0;4UDS?]W/-B+^/W8F[9]@W-+1MBOY`/W&AA9 Z>:9E#IW#5'''':_8@UR...

Hi. To begin with, I have a freshly built RedHat Linux 8.0 box running samba 2.2.8a. The kernel version is 2.4.18-14. I downloaded and compiled samba from source. I am using LPRng-3.8.9-6 as my printing system. The attached printer is a Lexmark Z22 printer and it is attached to the parralel port. Problem: For the life of me, I can't get NT type clients, NT4, 2K and XP to print to samba.