search for: 75f1cbd

...equest_queue *q) } if (issued) - virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq); + virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq, &vblk->lock); } static void virtblk_prepare_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req) diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c index 75f1cbd..852d563 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void register_buffer(u8 *buf, size_t size) if (virtqueue_add_buf(vq, &sg, 0, 1, buf) < 0) BUG(); - virtqueue_kick(vq); + virtqueue_kick(vq, NULL); } static...

...equest_queue *q) } if (issued) - virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq); + virtqueue_kick(vblk->vq, &vblk->lock); } static void virtblk_prepare_flush(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req) diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c index 75f1cbd..852d563 100644 --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/virtio-rng.c @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void register_buffer(u8 *buf, size_t size) if (virtqueue_add_buf(vq, &sg, 0, 1, buf) < 0) BUG(); - virtqueue_kick(vq); + virtqueue_kick(vq, NULL); } static...

virtqueue ops were introduced in the hope that we'll have multiple implementations besides virtio_ring, but none have surfaced so far, and given that existing virtio ring is deployed in production we are likely stuck with it now, so this layer just adds complexity and overhead. Further, the need to pass vq twice to each call (as in dev->vq->vq_ops->kick(dev->vq) ) adds potential

virtqueue ops were introduced in the hope that we'll have multiple implementations besides virtio_ring, but none have surfaced so far, and given that existing virtio ring is deployed in production we are likely stuck with it now, so this layer just adds complexity and overhead. Further, the need to pass vq twice to each call (as in dev->vq->vq_ops->kick(dev->vq) ) adds potential