search for: 755,7

...2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 37c7066..594f0ef 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ endif install: all $(if $(BUILD_DOCS),install-doc) mkdir -p "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" ifneq ($(TOOLS),) - $(INSTALL) -m 755 -s $(TOOLS) "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(TOOLS) "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" endif ifneq ($(BLOBS),) mkdir -p "$(DESTDIR)$(datadir)" diff --git a/Makefile.target b/Makefile.target index 19bb0fd..1cf7f34 100644 --- a/Makefile.target +++ b/Makefile.target @@...

...2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 37c7066..594f0ef 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ endif install: all $(if $(BUILD_DOCS),install-doc) mkdir -p "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" ifneq ($(TOOLS),) - $(INSTALL) -m 755 -s $(TOOLS) "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" + $(INSTALL) -m 755 $(TOOLS) "$(DESTDIR)$(bindir)" endif ifneq ($(BLOBS),) mkdir -p "$(DESTDIR)$(datadir)" diff --git a/Makefile.target b/Makefile.target index 19bb0fd..1cf7f34 100644 --- a/Makefile.target +++ b/Makefile.target @@...

...ailure (no match). */ if (subi >= sizeof(sub) - 1) Index: scp.c =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/openssh/scp.c,v retrieving revision 1.97 diff -u -p -r1.97 scp.c --- scp.c 21 Jun 2002 00:41:52 -0000 1.97 +++ scp.c 2 Aug 2002 12:13:43 -0000 @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ sink(argc, argv) if (*cp++ != ' ') SCREWUP("mode not delimited"); - for (size = 0; isdigit(*cp);) + for (size = 0; isdigit((unsigned)*cp);) size = size * 10 + (*cp++ - '0'); if (*cp++ != ' ') SCREWUP("size not delimited")...

...+ return; > + } > /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this > * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than > * silently failing to migrate this state) Do we have to touch this now? It's only used by MMIO, right? > @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment); > > vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align; > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); Don't we need to update rings? > } > > void virt...

...+ return; > + } > /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this > * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than > * silently failing to migrate this state) Do we have to touch this now? It's only used by MMIO, right? > @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment); > > vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align; > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); Don't we need to update rings? > } > > void virt...

...r_size is always 160, drop FIXED_POINT #ifdef Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double Fix file permission of libspeexdsp/scal.c libspeexdsp/resample.c | 18 +++++++----------- libspeexdsp/scal.c | 0 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) mode change 100755 => 100644 libspeexdsp/scal.c -- 1.9.1

...shbuf_reloc *reloc = NULL; struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf_bo *bo; struct nouveau_channel *chan = NULL; struct validate_op op; struct nouveau_fence *fence = NULL; - int i, j, ret = 0, do_reloc = 0; + int i, j, ret = 0; + bool do_reloc = false; if (unlikely(!abi16)) return -ENOMEM; @@ -755,7 +746,8 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, } /* Validate buffer list */ - ret = nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(chan, file_priv, bo, req->buffers, +revalidate: + ret = nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(chan, file_priv, bo, req->nr_buffers, &op, &d...

...DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE); > } else { > + if (!dma_map) > + goto out; > + > dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq), > extra[i].addr, > extra[i].len, > @@ -751,6 +755,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, > unsigned int in_sgs, > void *data, > void *ctx, > + bool dma_map, &gt...

...shbuf_reloc *reloc = NULL; struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf_bo *bo; struct nouveau_channel *chan = NULL; struct validate_op op; struct nouveau_fence *fence = NULL; - int i, j, ret = 0, do_reloc = 0; + int i, j, ret = 0; + bool do_reloc = false; if (unlikely(!abi16)) return -ENOMEM; @@ -755,7 +746,8 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, } /* Validate buffer list */ - ret = nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(chan, file_priv, bo, req->buffers, +revalidate: + ret = nouveau_gem_pushbuf_validate(chan, file_priv, bo, req->nr_buffers, &op, &d...

...har *err = NULL; int r = command (&out, &err, - str_lvm, cmd, + str_lvm, cmd, "--foreign", "--unbuffered", "--noheadings", "-o", field, device, NULL); if (r == -1) { @@ -755,7 +757,7 @@ get_lvm_fields (const char *cmd, const char *field, const char *device) CLEANUP_FREE char *out = NULL, *err = NULL; int r = command (&out, &err, - str_lvm, cmd, + str_lvm, cmd, "--foreign", "--unbuffe...

...t a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nvc0.cpp b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nvc0.cpp index e279ba7..ff48e94 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nvc0.cpp +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_lowering_nvc0.cpp @@ -755,7 +755,8 @@ NVC0LoweringPass::handleTEX(TexInstruction *i) assert(i->tex.useOffsets == 1); for (c = 0; c < 3; ++c) { ImmediateValue val; - assert(i->offset[0][c].getImmediate(val)); + if (!i->offset[0][c].getImmediate(val)) +...

...o this > > * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than > > * silently failing to migrate this state) > > Do we have to touch this now? > It's only used by MMIO, right? I don't think it hurts to put a guard in here. > > > > @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > > assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment); > > > > vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align; > > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); > > Don't we need to update rings?...

...o this > > * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than > > * silently failing to migrate this state) > > Do we have to touch this now? > It's only used by MMIO, right? I don't think it hurts to put a guard in here. > > > > @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align) > > assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment); > > > > vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align; > > - virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]); > > Don't we need to update rings?...

..., &hpos, - &stime, &etime, - mode); - } + vbl_status = get_scanout_position(crtc, in_vblank_irq, + &vpos, &hpos, + &stime, &etime, + mode); /* Return as no-op if scanout query unsupported or failed. */ if (!vbl_status) { @@ -755,7 +742,7 @@ bool drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_crtc *crtc, { return drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp_internal( crtc, max_error, vblank_time, in_vblank_irq, - crtc->helper_private->get_scanout_position, NULL); + crtc->helper_private->get_scanou...

...} else { > > + if (!dma_map) > > + goto out; > > + > > dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq), > > extra[i].addr, > > extra[i].len, > > @@ -751,6 +755,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, > > unsigned int in_sgs, > > void *data, > > void *ctx, > > +...

...; - mode); > - } > + vbl_status = get_scanout_position(crtc, in_vblank_irq, > + &vpos, &hpos, > + &stime, &etime, > + mode); > > /* Return as no-op if scanout query unsupported or failed. */ > if (!vbl_status) { > @@ -755,7 +742,7 @@ bool drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > { > return drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp_internal( > crtc, max_error, vblank_time, in_vblank_irq, > - crtc->helper_private->get_scanout_position, NULL); > + crtc->help...

The following two patches allow the parallel use of memsharing, xenpaging and xen-access by using an independent ring buffer for each feature. Please review. v2: - update mem_event_check_ring arguments, check domain rather than domain_id - check ring_full first because its value was just evaluated - check if ring buffer is initialized before calling mem_access_domctl/mem_paging_domctl

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num) > > { > > + /* > > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be > > + * updated if the ring addresses have

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num) > > { > > + /* > > + * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be > > + * updated if the ring addresses have

From: Thierry Reding <treding at nvidia.com> This small series of patches implements support for waiting on and emitting fence FDs on kickoff. This enables explicit fencing and can be used for example to synchronize buffer accesses between the display engine and the GPU on Tegra. The first patch lays the groundwork by splitting up nouveau_fence_sync() to allow reuse. Patch 2 is where the