Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "75173".
Did you mean:
7173
2007 May 23
0
iptables patch-o-matic
...ut
geoip and imq seem to be missing.
Did anyone build these on CentOS 5? Is there a better way than using pom?
regards,
Andreas Micklei
--
Andreas Micklei
IVISTAR Kommunikationssysteme AG
Ehrenbergstr. 19 / 10245 Berlin, Germany
http://www.ivistar.de
Handelsregister: Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 75173
Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE207795030
Vorstand: Dr.-Ing. Dirk Elias
Aufsichtsratsvorsitz: Dipl.-Betriebsw. Frank Bindel
2007 Sep 03
1
Can we use 2 tc filter rules with the same prio
Hi ALL,
I am using below script for DOWNLOADING. it is only for HTTP and HTTPS.
I have given the same prio for both. (i.e prio 1).
pls see my script given below. (last 2 lines of the script where I have
highlighted in BOLD letters)
Can I have 2 tc filter rules with the same prio?
What is the proper method to write?
MY SCRIPT IS BELOW
#traffic shaping on eth1 (Downloading)
INTERFAZ_LAN=eth1
2007 May 21
3
Installing to other than "/" label
I have a system with Fedora installed on the partition with label "/". Can
I install CentOS on a new empty partition (/dev/cciss/c0d3p1), or do I need
to remove the "/" label on the Fedora partition and change Fedora's fstab
to mount by physical partition? I'd like to keep Fedora as a fall-back OS
until I have CentOS completely up and working.
My Fedora fstab:
2008 Jun 25
6
5.2 blues
Hi all,
Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the
feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems...
--
Best Wishes
Sorin
---------------------------------------------
http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/
Proud member of TEAM OS/2.
Mountainbiker [Kona Kilauea - Member of Equipe Les Cafards VTT]
Motorcyclist [Honda VFR750F-'97]
2007 Jul 21
3
NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)
Hello all,
I am implementing a new mail server into our environment consisting of
three machines - two Dell Opterons that will act as load balanced
Postfix servers, and a 1.5TB RAID10 NFS server. All three machines are
running CentOS 4.5.
Since the NFS is going to be used for only mail, I was kicking around
the idea to use XFS. I have CentOS installed on an ext3 partition, and
with the
2010 Apr 14
0
Processed: submitter 252771, submitter 268152, submitter 312829, submitter 418048, submitter 436960 ...
...Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>
Bug #446921 [mount] mount -oremount,size=10G /tmp miswrites mtab
Changed Bug submitter to 'Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>' from 'Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>'
> submitter 75173 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>
Bug #75173 [mtr] mtr fails to open with an empty DISPLAY
Changed Bug submitter to 'Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>' from 'brederlo at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de'
> submitter 374029 Goswin von Brederlow <goswi...
2007 May 09
4
Suggestions for partition
The recent thread on Anaconda and RAID10 made me start to think about
how to partition a server I'm about to set up. I have two 146GB SCSI
drives on an IBM x3550. It will be used as a build system. As such,
there is no critical data on these systems, as the source code will
be checked out of our source control system, and the build results
are copied to another system. I usually
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...10415
Towers.ll 12 18539 0 0.01 18520 0 0.01 18520
trace.ll 11 34795 0 0.01 34779 0 0.01 34779
traits.ll 7 25582 0 0.01 25563 0 0.01 25563
tramp3d-v4.ll 9738 17955754 2880 4.83 17589374 * * *
transform8x8.ll 12 491518 0 0.04 491497 0 0.05 491497
trans.ll 9 27788 0 0.01 27767 0 0.01 27767
tree.ll 29 75173 0 0.02 75143 0 0.01 75143
Treesort.ll 8 20035 0 0.01 20016 0 0.01 20016
Triang.ll 4 30696 0 0.01 30674 0 0.01 30674
trie.ll 12 33266 0 0.01 33243 0 0.01 33243
trig.ll 9 38056 0 0.01 38033 0 0.01 38242
trim.ll 7 106745 0 0.02 106729 0 0.02 106729
trisolv.ll 12 21126 0 0.01 21075 0 0.01 21075
trmm.ll...