search for: 75173

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "75173".

Did you mean: 7173
2007 May 23
0
iptables patch-o-matic
...ut geoip and imq seem to be missing. Did anyone build these on CentOS 5? Is there a better way than using pom? regards, Andreas Micklei -- Andreas Micklei IVISTAR Kommunikationssysteme AG Ehrenbergstr. 19 / 10245 Berlin, Germany http://www.ivistar.de Handelsregister: Berlin Charlottenburg HRB 75173 Umsatzsteuer-ID: DE207795030 Vorstand: Dr.-Ing. Dirk Elias Aufsichtsratsvorsitz: Dipl.-Betriebsw. Frank Bindel
2007 Sep 03
1
Can we use 2 tc filter rules with the same prio
Hi ALL, I am using below script for DOWNLOADING. it is only for HTTP and HTTPS. I have given the same prio for both. (i.e prio 1). pls see my script given below. (last 2 lines of the script where I have highlighted in BOLD letters) Can I have 2 tc filter rules with the same prio? What is the proper method to write? MY SCRIPT IS BELOW #traffic shaping on eth1 (Downloading) INTERFAZ_LAN=eth1
2007 May 21
3
Installing to other than "/" label
I have a system with Fedora installed on the partition with label "/". Can I install CentOS on a new empty partition (/dev/cciss/c0d3p1), or do I need to remove the "/" label on the Fedora partition and change Fedora's fstab to mount by physical partition? I'd like to keep Fedora as a fall-back OS until I have CentOS completely up and working. My Fedora fstab:
2008 Jun 25
6
5.2 blues
Hi all, Am I the only one to have had a totally trouble-free upgrade to 5.2?? I get the feeling that most everybody seems to have *some* problems... -- Best Wishes Sorin --------------------------------------------- http://home-skynet.servehttp.com/ Proud member of TEAM OS/2. Mountainbiker [Kona Kilauea - Member of Equipe Les Cafards VTT] Motorcyclist [Honda VFR750F-'97]
2007 Jul 21
3
NFS filesystem recommendations please (and problems with XFS)
Hello all, I am implementing a new mail server into our environment consisting of three machines - two Dell Opterons that will act as load balanced Postfix servers, and a 1.5TB RAID10 NFS server. All three machines are running CentOS 4.5. Since the NFS is going to be used for only mail, I was kicking around the idea to use XFS. I have CentOS installed on an ext3 partition, and with the
2010 Apr 14
0
Processed: submitter 252771, submitter 268152, submitter 312829, submitter 418048, submitter 436960 ...
...Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de> Bug #446921 [mount] mount -oremount,size=10G /tmp miswrites mtab Changed Bug submitter to 'Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>' from 'Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>' > submitter 75173 Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de> Bug #75173 [mtr] mtr fails to open with an empty DISPLAY Changed Bug submitter to 'Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b at web.de>' from 'brederlo at informatik.uni-tuebingen.de' > submitter 374029 Goswin von Brederlow <goswi...
2007 May 09
4
Suggestions for partition
The recent thread on Anaconda and RAID10 made me start to think about how to partition a server I'm about to set up. I have two 146GB SCSI drives on an IBM x3550. It will be used as a build system. As such, there is no critical data on these systems, as the source code will be checked out of our source control system, and the build results are copied to another system. I usually
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...10415 Towers.ll 12 18539 0 0.01 18520 0 0.01 18520 trace.ll 11 34795 0 0.01 34779 0 0.01 34779 traits.ll 7 25582 0 0.01 25563 0 0.01 25563 tramp3d-v4.ll 9738 17955754 2880 4.83 17589374 * * * transform8x8.ll 12 491518 0 0.04 491497 0 0.05 491497 trans.ll 9 27788 0 0.01 27767 0 0.01 27767 tree.ll 29 75173 0 0.02 75143 0 0.01 75143 Treesort.ll 8 20035 0 0.01 20016 0 0.01 20016 Triang.ll 4 30696 0 0.01 30674 0 0.01 30674 trie.ll 12 33266 0 0.01 33243 0 0.01 33243 trig.ll 9 38056 0 0.01 38033 0 0.01 38242 trim.ll 7 106745 0 0.02 106729 0 0.02 106729 trisolv.ll 12 21126 0 0.01 21075 0 0.01 21075 trmm.ll...