Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "7516e99b".
2016 Sep 02
2
Problem with "[SimplifyCFG] Handle tail-sinking of more than 2 incoming branches"
...der immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160902/7516e99b/attachment.html>
2016 Sep 02
2
Problem with "[SimplifyCFG] Handle tail-sinking of more than 2 incoming branches"
Probably the issue is solvable in some Codegen prepare pass.
That said I still believe some kind of control on if we would like to implement this or not could be useful.
Just a question. Why implementing it in SimplifyCFG and not as a separate pass like JumpThreading or something like that? The transformation itself doesn’t seem to fit much in SimplifyCFG.
> On 2 Sep 2016, at 13:35, Michael