search for: 750mb

...et this error: VMware Workstation unrecoverable error: (vcpu-0) NOT_REACHED F(562):1742 A log file is available in ... I have done a "minimal install" of CentOS 5 (all checkboxes in the category/task selection screen are unchecked -- so to X-Windows involved) and the virtual machine has 750MB of RAM. I'm using VMWare Workstation 4.5 and the host OS is Windows XP Pro. I have not been able to install the VMWare tool since I can't get it to finish booting. Has anyone else run into this? I have seen some discussion on the list about VMWare and CentOS 5, but nothing that seemed t...

...ormant and that it would conserve disc space. But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du` Another account has around 750MB according to IMAP but using du I find 1.5GB. This is for message files and index files combined. Is this normal? I tried to read the MailboxFormat/dbox wiki page and it does not directly address this topic but it does reference "doveadm purge". Do I need to use "doveadm purge&quo...

...g it would be a great way of showing off Rails in general, giving a progress update to customers, trying out ideas, and generally all the other benefits that come from having a completely portable environment. However, the 168Mb of files that make up my Instant Rails (with extra gems) is consuming 750Mb of space on my USB key. The reason is simple enough; the USB is formatted as FAT32, and having lots of small files stored on a FAT32 partition is a great way to burn your disc space quickly. Unfortunately, I don''t seem to be able to reformat the USB key as anything other than FAT or FAT3...

Hello, I am just installing XCP 0.1.1 on a server with 24GB RAM Normally XCP is a 64 bits version but * *uname -a* Linux node012 2.6.27.42-0.1.1.xs0.1.1.737.1065xen #1 SMP Fri Jan 15 16:20:16 EST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux (not a x86_64 version !!!!) * *cat /proc/meminfo* MemTotal: 746496 kB MemFree: 384332 kB Buffers:

Good evening every body, I am a new one of this mail list. In my project I have faced a problem. That is when I copied my files from windows2000srv to redhat8 Linux or from redhat8 to windows2000srv by samba(the quantity of file is 26200 and the size is about 750MB) I found that about 10 files lost. The quantity of lost file is changed every time. Would you like to help me? Is this a problem of windows?Or samba?Or the smb.conf of samba? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! BB is Broadband by Yahoo! http://bb.yahoo.co.jp/

In the course of debugging my still-unsolved "smbclient tar starts throwing SMB signature errors after 750MB of data or so" error, I came across this apparent inconsistency... >From the smb.conf man page: "client use spnego (G) This variable controls controls whether samba clients will try to use Simple and Protected NEGOciation (as specified by rfc2478) with WindowsXP and Windows2000 serv...

...write iozone 4 streams 320MB/s read iozone 4 streams single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not good. These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single box testing to find what actually made a difference): performance.cache-size 1GB (Default 23MB) performance.client-io-threads on performance.io-thread-count...

...ad iozone 4 streams > single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M > simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files > Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read > Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read > > I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations > and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not > good. > > These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single > box testing to find what actually made a difference): > performance.cache-size 1GB (Default 23MB) > performance.client-io-threads on...

...read iozone 4 streams > single stream read 91MB/s @64K, 141MB/s @1M > simultaneous iozone 4 stream 5G files > Server 1: 1200MB/s write, 200MB/s read > Server 2: 950MB/s write, 310MB/s read > > I did some earlier single brick tests with samba VFS and 3 workstations and got up to 750MB/s write and 800MB/s read aggregate but that's still not good. > > These are the only volume settings tweaks I have made (after much single box testing to find what actually made a difference): > performance.cache-size 1GB (Default 23MB) > performance.client-io-threads on > pe...

...it would conserve disc space. > > But lately i found mailboxes have nearly double the storage as reported. I mean, IMAP QUOTA reports around 900MB for one account that has over 2GB when I inspect the mail location of the user using the linux command `du` > > Another account has around 750MB according to IMAP but using du I find 1.5GB. This is for message files and index files combined. > > Is this normal? I tried to read the MailboxFormat/dbox wiki page and it does not directly address this topic but it does reference "doveadm purge". Do I need to use "doveadm pu...

you can watch on my site www.kayalion.net with network usage, eth1 is the internet. i rebooted my server last night. i didn't connect and watched my eth1, after 10 minutes there was allready +-8mb sent. stats now: uptime : 14 hours 20 minutes network usage : 736.02 MB i don't think my isp is going to like this :p <p>> >Hi: > >ummmm.. If there's no-one listening

...t; i don't think my isp is going to like this :p > >Can you be sure that your server isn't compromised by crackers and/or >script kiddies, and that nobody is getting data through any other >service? What do your logfiles tell you? Besides, eth0 recieved ~720MB >and eth1 sent ~750MB ... is this a gateway doing NAT/routing packets? :P why the smiley behind the routing stuff?? $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.222.222.0/24 -j MASQUERADE 2>> /var/log/gateway.txt i run this, is this not good?? i run my server here at a house for students, there was a other student that...

hi, recently I installed xen 3.0 at centOS5.1 server with one centOS5.1 virtual machine, and I set the virtual machine allocate 2 vcpu and minimum memory allocation is 256mb, and maximum memory allocation is 750mb. and the virtual machine running fine at idle status, and allocated 256mb memory. And today I install an application called dotcms, and it : Using JAVA_OPTS: -Ddotserver=dotcms_1.5.1 -Xss2048k -Xmn100M -Xms500M -Xmx500M , the application is hanged until I manually allocation 515mb memory for this v...

...g. I have a Sandisk U3 Cruzer Micro 4.0GB flash drive. I have removed the U3 software via the uninstall utility on the U3 website. The USB flash drive is on /dev/sdc I have tried this with syslinux 3.11 (from Ubuntu 7.04) and syslinux 3.36 (from Ubuntu Gutsy). I fdisked the drive and created a 750MB FAT16 partition (type 0x6) and made it active. It is /dev/sdc1 I cat'ed the mbr.bin (from the syslinux package) to /dev/sdc. I have also tried putting the MBR on using 'ms-sys'. I then did: syslinux /dev/sdc1 (also tried syslinux -s /dev/sdc1). I also setup stuff so that I would h...

...sync-qa at samba.org Okay, so it's great that rsync has built in compression that can be switched off for known compressed file types, however there is still some extra control that could be useful for tweaking when to compress files. For example, in my case I know that all of the files over 750mb on my machine are mostly movie files; obviously I can add file-extension for these, but there are quite a lot of possible movie file wrappers, so it might be easier if I could disable compression over a certain size, as this would also exclude things like disk images that are probably compressed al...

...ver IPoIB interface, but i've not managed to get a good level of performance with real data. I was maxing about 220MB/s with a single thread and around 550MB/s with 12 or more threads. Benchmarking with a huge file made from /dev/zero gives me around 800-900MB/s with multiple threads and around 750MB/s single thread. Not sure why would glusterfs has a good level of performance when reading from RAM but is only working at 1/2 of the disk speed when reading real data from the disk? 3. Glusterfs with NFS also gives me crappy results. Running NFS directly from zfs pool gives me a far better perfo...

...ware add-on to about 49,386 kb/s. All clips were converted to yuv4mpeg format and then copied to /dev/shm to remove, as much as possible, any potential outside influences on encoder performance. This limited me to working with clips whose size in yuv4mpeg format would be under approximately 750MB. Also, no sound was included, thus limiting this test solely to Theora encoding. Commands used were of the form: time ~/packages/libtheora-1.0/examples/encoder_example --output /dev/null --video-quality 7 canon-powershot-A550.yuv4mpeg I am presenting the best time out of three trials for each c...

...Platform: x86 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: markf78@yahoo.com QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org the zip drive is a firewire iomega 750mb drive... the folder /home/zip750 contains roughly 350MB. [root@markf78 zip750]# rsync -vr /home/zip750 /mnt/zip/zip750 building file list ... done zip750/#canadienkings.txt# zip750/C/2b.c zip750/C/fileio.h zip750/C/hash.c zip750/C/hash.h zip750/C/httpfn.c zip750/C/httpfn.h zip750/C/random.c zip750...

Hi, this might be offtopic - please excuse if it turns out to be. I have rather big ( > 20 Gb) source archives on two different machines. Unfortunately there is only a very slow network connection between these machines. To synchronize these two archives (directory trees), I'd like to generate a directory tree of signature files (instead of the real ones). Then I would copy only these to

Hi all. I have two Rails applications. Each is on its own VPS hosted by Pipespring (excellent service btw). My app runs lightning quick - AFTER the first load. If I visit my site after a period of inactivity (i.e. no visitors to my site), it takes up to 10 seconds to load that first time. After that I can hop around with no problems. Has anyone run into this before? Ideas? - Rabbit