search for: 750kbit

Hey all. I''m trying to set up QoS using the HTB qdisc in a very basic setup, but it the example shown in the howto doesn''t seem to be working. While the packets show up in the correct classes, they appear to be completely ignoring the rates, meaning nothing gets shaped. My setup is that I''ve got a a bunch of machines behind my firewall/router: 1.2.3.1

...(If anyone known of a better way to mark packets, please tell me. I would love to find some module that adds an IP option with UIDs and GIDs to the packets - does anyone know if such a module already exists?), and I want my router to deprioritize them. I also want to limit my outbound bandwidth to 750kbit overall. So anyway, this is my qdisc setup: tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: cbq bandwidth 10mbit \ avpkt 1000 rate 750kbit cell 8 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1: handle 2: prio bands 4 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 2:1 handle 3: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 2:2 handle 4: sfq...

...the implementation, I only wrote 1 on the subclass Cause they are all on the same template. tc qdisc add dev $QOSIN root handle 1:0 htb default 1000 tc class add dev $QOSIN parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 2000kbit ### SUBCLASS1 tc class add dev $QOSIN parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 750kbit ceil 2000kbit prio 1 tc class add dev $QOSIN parent 1:10 classid 1:101 htb rate 250kbit ceil 2000kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev $QOSIN parent 1:101 handle 101: pfifo limit 10 tc class add dev $QOSIN parent 1:10 classid 1:102 htb rate 250kbit ceil 2000kbit prio 1 tc qdisc add dev $QOSIN parent 1:1...

Hello, I''ve just compiled the kernel 2.6.17 and noticed an odd HTB behaviour. For instance: tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbit ceil 750Kbit burst 15k tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 15 u32 match ip dst 192.168.5.1 classid 1:30 The filter works ok and the traffic to 192.168.5.1 flows through the class 1:30, but the rate gets much higher than 750 Kbps. As far as I realized, the faster the processor is, the higher the...

Is it possible (one way or another) to guarantee or to limit bandwidth of 1 session? E.g.: RDP: 750kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil default: 250kbit rate, 1Mbit ceil max bw per RDP connection: 100kbit guaranteed bw per RDP session: 20kbit R. -- ___________________________________________________________________ It''s so simple to be wise. Just think of something stupid to say and say the opposite. +...

...disc add dev eth1 parent 1:3 handle 30 pfifo limit 10 This simple setup should split the 1mbit bandwidth between TCP and UDP. I run 2 IPerf clients simultaneously Server: iperf -s -p 200 iperf -s -p 400 -u Client: iperf -c $ServerIP -p 200 iperf -c $ServerIP -p 400 -u then UDP traffic takes about 750kbit and TCP traffic takes about 250kbit Can anyone tell me why is that? thanx, Ibrahim _________________________________________________________________ Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _____________________________________...

Can someone verify that using fw as a filter in iproute2-2.6.11-050330 is broken. Doesn''t seem to work in any case and I saw an earlier post that would lead me to believe this is the case. If so does anyone have a temporary fix? Thanks, Troy

Hi, I have two transparent bridges on either side of a WAN connection. What I''d like to do is utilize the full 1.5Mb/s on the WAN without creating spikes and drops for my audio stream. The approach at this point has been to limit each bridge in sending 750kbit/s through to the other bridge so we get the 1.5Mb total. The downside is after reserving 200kbit/s for my audio stream this leaves only 550kbit/s download for the people at my co-lo which becomes frustratingly slow with WinXP file sharing. I would change the balance in favour of the co-lo in...

Hi all, I''m new to using iproute2 for traffic shaping but not new to Linux. Essentially I have a WAN between two cities that I stream audio over for rebroadcast. Since it''s all done live stability and prioritization is critical in staying on air for our radio broadcasts. My WAN is 1.5Mbit PVC within my provider''s infrastructure so I have an unencrypted direct

...# minimum rates. # ceil is 90% of max rate (768kbps) # rate is 80% of max rate # we don''t let it go to 100% because we don''t want the WAN provider to buffer CEIL=4500kbit RATE1=1000kbit RATE2=3000kbit RATE3=500kbit APPRATE1=1500kbit APPRATE2=750kbit APPRATE3=250kbit $TC qdisc ${TCOP} dev ${WAN} root handle 1: htb $TC class ${TCOP} dev ${WAN} parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate ${CEIL} ceil ${CEIL} $TC class ${TCOP} dev ${WAN} parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate ${RATE1} ceil ${CEIL} prio 1 $TC class ${TCOP} dev ${WAN} parent 1...

Hi again, I keep posting about my problem with HTB -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2005q3/016611.html With a bit of search I recently found the exact same problem I have in the 2004 archives with some graphs that explain it far better than I did -> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014519.html and http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2004q4/014568.html