search for: 74l

...uot;), class = "factor"), Var2 = structure(c(89L, 89L, 89L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 86L, 86L, 86L, 85L, 85L, 85L, 84L, 84L, 84L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 80L, 80L, 80L, 79L, 79L, 79L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 77L, 77L, 77L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 72L, 72L, 72L, 71L, 71L, 71L, 70L, 70L, 70L, 69L, 69L, 69L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 65L, 65L, 65L, 64L, 64L, 64L, 63L, 63L, 63L, 62L, 62L, 62L, 61L, 61L, 61L, 60L, 60L, 60L, 59L, 59L, 59L, 58L, 58L, 58L, 57L, 57L, 57L, 56L, 56L, 56L, 55...

....2, 2.2, 0.7, 1.8, 4.5, 4.5, 4.6, 4.5, 4.6, 3.9, 4.2, 4.9, 4.9, 4.5, 16.7, 17.4, 17.5, 17.5, 17.4, 1.9, 2.4, 1.7, 1.2, 1.5, 1.1, 1.8, 3.1, 3.1, 3, 4.1, 4.2, 2.7, 4.5, 0.4, 1.2, 3, 3.5, 1.2, 0.8, 0.9, 2, -0.8, 5.8, 0.6, 1, 0.9, 4.4, 2.3, -0.1), dD = c(-66L, -81L, -81L, -71L, -68L, -79L, -73L, -77L, -74L, -71L, -73L, -80L, -76L, -80L, -74L, -77L, -74L, -77L, -74L, -82L, -79L, -72L, -74L, -71L, -76L, -72L, -76L, -73L, -75L, -78L, -81L, -77L, -77L, -73L, -79L, -104L, -98L, -98L, -109L, -106L, -99L, -107L, -100L, -98L, -95L, -95L, -95L, -97L, -98L, -121L, -119L, -118L, -121L, -121L, -106L, -116L, -122...

...1 (0,0.05] 68 2 (0.05,0.1] 87 3 (0.1,0.15] 85 4 (0.15,0.2] 72 5 (0.2,0.25] 65 6 (0.25,0.3] 73 7 (0.3,0.35] 74 .... I would prefer a dataframe labelled like this. 0.05 68 0.1 87 How to do? Thanks Wim > dput (test.tab) structure(c(68L, 87L, 85L, 72L, 65L, 73L, 74L, 72L, 77L, 78L, 75L, 74L, 83L, 93L, 89L, 75L, 67L, 59L, 56L, 208L), .Dim = 20L, .Dimnames = structure(list( c("(0,0.05]", "(0.05,0.1]", "(0.1,0.15]", "(0.15,0.2]", "(0.2,0.25]", "(0.25,0.3]", "(0.3,0.35]", "(0.35,0.4...

...50L, 50L, 50L, 50L, 50L, 50L, 51L, 51L, 52L, 52L, 53L, 53L, 53L, 54L, 54L, 54L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 56L, 57L, 57L, 57L, 58L, 58L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 60L, 60L, 61L, 61L, 62L, 62L, 63L, 63L, 64L, 64L, 64L, 65L, 65L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 69L, 69L, 70L, 70L, 71L, 71L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 79L, 79L, 80L, 80L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 84L, 85L, 85L, 85L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 88L, 89L, 89L, 90L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 91L, 92L, 93L, 93L, 94L, 95L, 95L, 95L, 95L, 96L, 96L...

Hi All, I have a scatter plot produced using ggplot2 and I want to add the regression line to this scatter plot. I suppose I can use geom_smooth() to do this, but for the sake of learning ( I am new both to R and ggplot2), I want to try and add it as a function (something that curve() does in the standard R plotting). I did some search and found that stat_function() can be used for this. But

...eqgre", "gicam"), class = "factor"), Sq122.median = c(2.335835, 1.76091, 1.64717, 1.285505, 1.572405, 1.86761, 1.82541, 1.62458, 0.157813, 0.864523)), .Names = c("SPECSHOR", "Sq122.median"), class = "data.frame", row.names = c(9L, 16L, 23L, 74L, 83L, 90L, 98L, 109L, 121L, 139L)) par(mfrow=c(2,2)) ## not necessary in that example, but I do need it with my real data boxplot(Sq122.median~SPECSHOR, data=df, horizontal=TRUE) ## the upper label on the y-axis (gicam) is not shown I know I can decrease the size of the labels by setting cex....

..., 206L, 185L, 192L, 203L, 196L, 190L, 195L, 192L, 217L, 210L, 181L, 197L, 222L, 123L, 168L, 156L, 169L, 178L, 178L, 149L, 181L, 175L, 177L, 168L, 153L, 179L, 139L, 156L, 142L, 115L, 135L, 143L, 164L, 158L, 111L, 119L, 131L, 120L, 160L, 141L, 161L, 123L, 135L, 152L, 135L, 164L, 191L, 183L, 81L, 94L, 74L, 90L, 77L, 62L, 57L, 74L, 71L, 71L, 77L, 72L, 63L, 77L, 83L, 63L, 68L, 83L, 71L, 81L, 73L, 70L, 81L, 91L, 91L, 78L, 93L, 75L, 71L, 64L, 62L, 51L, 56L, 47L, 51L, 93L, 66L, 74L, 67L, 70L, 66L, 71L, 60L, 71L, 79L, 73L, 96L, 81L, 89L, 54L, 63L, 52L, 48L, 48L, 57L, 69L, 101L, 109L, 89L, 74L, 96L, 97L, 9...

...7L, 58L, 58L, >>>>>>>>> 58L, 59L, 60L, 60L, 60L, 61L, 61L, 62L, 62L, 63L, 63L, 64L, 64L, >>>>>>>>> 64L, 65L, 65L, 66L, 66L, 66L, 67L, 67L, 67L, 68L, 68L, 68L, 69L, >>>>>>>>> 69L, 70L, 70L, 71L, 71L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 73L, 74L, 74L, 74L, 74L, >>>>>>>>> 75L, 75L, 75L, 75L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 76L, 78L, 78L, 78L, 79L, 79L, >>>>>>>>> 80L, 80L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 81L, 82L, 82L, 82L, 83L, 83L, 83L, 84L, >>>>>>>>> 85L, 85L, 85L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87L, 87...

...23.96, 24, 24.01, 24.14, 24.5, 24.61, 24.76, 24.85, 24.99, 25, 25.6, 25.61, 25.7, 26.09, 26.5, 26.72, 26.89, 29.5, 30.54, 40.63, 40.73, 41.74, 43.5, 44.33, 45.33, 46.05, 47.11, 47.34, 49.58, 50.71, 77, 86.68, 97, 133.6, 203.48), Size = c(664640L, 440L, 407L, 180L, 690L, 851L, 190L, 480L, 720L, 74L, 111L, 1560L, 11400L, 160L, 9333L, 55665L, 222L, 23662L, 210L, 12735L, 1757L, 63736L, 18318L, 460L, 120L, 680L, 400L, 960L, 432L, 259L, 840L, 8200L, 630L, 180L, 189L, 1490L, 27L, 8080L, 6291L, 240L, 841L, 5469L, 4035L, 12555L, 5320L, 9249L, 240L, 1149L, 40L, 660L, 333L, 4360L, 180L, 360L, 240L...

...14L, 15L, 16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 20L, 21L, 22L, 23L, 24L, 25L, 26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 41L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 51L, 52L, 53L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 57L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 61L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, 66L, 67L, 68L, 69L, 70L, 71L, 72L, 73L, 74L, 75L, 76L, 77L, 78L, 79L, 80L, 81L, 82L, 83L, 84L, 85L, 86L, 87L, 88L, 89L, 90L, 91L, 92L, 93L, 94L, 95L, 96L, 97L, 98L, 99L, 100L, 101L, 102L, 103L, 104L, 105L, 106L, 107L, 108L, 109L, 110L, 111L, 112L, 113L, 114L, 115L, 116L, ...... ...... ..... V2 = structure(c(278L, 23L, 11L, 169L, 14L, 86L, 94...

I'm trying to read a binary file created by a fortran code using readBin and readChar. Everything reads fine (integers and strings) except for double precision numbers, they are read as huge or very small number (1E-250,...). I tried various endianness, swap, But nothing has worked so far. I also tried on R 64 bit for linux and windows (R 2.14) and R 2.11 on windows XP 32 bit. Any help would

...uot;Group 5". I am hoping for a few different techniques which I can pass on to my students. Thanks David Arnold College of the Redwoods > dput(flies) structure(list(long = c(40L, 37L, 44L, 47L, 47L, 47L, 68L, 47L, 54L, 61L, 71L, 75L, 89L, 58L, 59L, 62L, 79L, 96L, 58L, 62L, 70L, 72L, 74L, 96L, 75L, 46L, 42L, 65L, 46L, 58L, 42L, 48L, 58L, 50L, 80L, 63L, 65L, 70L, 70L, 72L, 97L, 46L, 56L, 70L, 70L, 72L, 76L, 90L, 76L, 92L, 21L, 40L, 44L, 54L, 36L, 40L, 56L, 60L, 48L, 53L, 60L, 60L, 65L, 68L, 60L, 81L, 81L, 48L, 48L, 56L, 68L, 75L, 81L, 48L, 68L, 35L, 37L, 49L, 46L, 63L, 39L, 46L,...

what am I doing wrong? chron(as.character(f), format=c(dates="%m/%d/%y", times="%h:%m")) f <- structure(c(51L, 60L, 66L, 87L, 90L, 115L, 23L, 35L, 37L, 6L, 12L, 55L, 84L, 96L, 109L, 17L, 29L, 41L, 3L, 74L, 94L, 102L, 30L, 8L, 46L, 69L, 107L, 15L, 25L, 39L, 1L, 71L, 95L, 19L, 56L, 62L, 76L, 85L, 99L, 111L, 42L, 4L, 52L, 61L, 67L, 91L, 13L, 24L, 36L, 38L, 7L, 81L, 82L, 57L, 64L, 100L, 113L, 21L, 33L, 44L, 78L, 54L, 73L, 83L, 108L, 16L, 28L, 2L, 58L, 65L, 86L, 101L, 32L, 43L, 77L, 93L, 104L, 10L, 48L,...

Dear R users, I want to aggregate all *d *data from all combination of n *plots* taken by k. Thank very much! My data is like that: plot d 1 14 1 13 1 12 1 14 1 18 1 20 1 21 1 43 1 108 1 43 2 41 2 61 2 83 2 61 2 84 2 45 2 21 2 12 2 11 ... 100 10 100 12 -- --- Catalin-Constantin ROIBU Forestry engineer, PhD Forestry Faculty of Suceava

...381, 2.968, 3.247, 3.063, 3.284, 3.24, 2.948, 3.133, 3.482, 3.467, 3.474, 3.659, 3.294, 3.394, 3.293, 3.312, 3.386, 3.755, 3.419, 3.586, 3.539, 3.464, 3.461), H0 = c(19L, 14L, 17L, 13L, 17L, 14L, 17L, 46L, 49L, 29L, 45L, 51L, 65L, 65L, 43L, 56L, 65L, 58L, 59L, 68L, 43L, 55L, 52L, 51L, 55L, 81L, 74L, 86L, 57L, 53L, 58L), H1 = c(14.98425525, 12.49089526, 12.42859666, 11.55363377, 14.22498606, 11.06735739, 13.8737699, 30.78415163, 29.40015657, 19.45297471, 25.71308484, 21.3916359, 26.68228868, 25.53372175, 19.06778001, 22.94270452, 32.52470648, 32.04047669, 32.26554685, 38.82250095, 26.9504...

...6L, 262L, 159L, 195L, 102L,? 75L, 136L, 402L, 32L, 199L, 286L, 477L, 54L, 429L, 80L, 316L,? 30L, 333L, 387L, 452L, 324L, 456L, 39L, 138L, 113L, 448L, 377L,? 122L, 441L, 396L, 454L, 497L, 161L, 21L, 117L, 413L, 94L, 459L,? 156L, 365L, 322L, 397L, 88L, 207L, 150L, 209L, 184L, 378L, 217L,? 176L, 52L, 374L, 189L, 97L, 340L, 357L, 157L, 220L, 74L, 356L,? 495L, 453L, 26L, 499L, 364L, 267L, 331L, 245L, 258L, 242L, 381L,? 36L, 16L, 328L, 131L, 255L, 363L, 298L, 373L, 416L, 200L, 56L,? 263L, 288L, 13L, 305L, 291L, 17L, 53L, 130L, 458L, 385L, 198L,? 158L, 140L, 492L, 249L, 27L, 134L, 479L, 171L, 177L, 9L,...

Hi, I have a data set: > Dataset X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 1 user1 m 22 19 28 24 12 18 9 7 4 5 4 7 5 7 9 2 user2 f 25 19 23 18 18 15 6 8 6 6 7 10 7 7 7 3 user3 f 28 21 24 18 15 12 10 6 7 9 5 10 5 9 5 4 user4 f 26 19 26 21 12 18 6 6 5 1 3 8 6 5 6 5 user5 m 21 22 26 18 9 6 4 6 1

...18L, 19L, 20L, 21L, 22L, 23L, 24L, 25L, 26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L, 37L, 38L, 39L, 40L, 41L, 42L, 43L, 44L, 45L, 46L, 47L, 48L, 49L, 50L, 51L, 52L, 53L, 54L, 55L, 56L, 57L, 58L, 59L, 60L, 61L, 62L, 63L, 64L, 65L, 66L, 67L, 68L, 69L, 70L, 71L, 72L, 73L, 74L, 75L, 76L, 77L, 78L, 79L, 80L, 81L, 82L, 83L, 84L, 85L, 86L, 87L, 88L, 89L, 90L, 91L, 92L, 93L, 94L, 95L, 96L, 1L, 2L, 3L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L, 8L, 9L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L, 16L, 17L, 18L, 19L, 20L, 21L, 22L, 23L, 24L, 25L, 26L, 27L, 28L, 29L, 30L, 31L, 32L, 33L, 34L, 35L, 36L,...

I have been working with the pls procedure and have problems getting the procedure to work with matrix or frame data. I suspect the problem lies in my understanding of frames, but can't find anything in the documentation that will help. Here is what I have done: I read in an 10000 x 8 table of data, and assign the first four columns to matrix A and the second four to matrix B pls <-

Folks, I have a data frame with columns 200401, 200402, ..., 201207, 201208. These represent years/months. What would be the best way to sum these columns by year? What about by quarter? Thanks for your time, KW -- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]