search for: 74bc20a9

Hi Chris, On 19/02/13 03:08, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com > <mailto:chandlerc at google.com>> wrote: >> >> > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on >> function bodies, not on prototypes. >> > >> Yeah, I noticed that after sending this

...bute, we don't synthesize it. (I feel like this may have been Bill's original proposal, and we're circling around now... apologies if so...) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130219/74bc20a9/attachment.html>

On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:01 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > In the context of LTO, it makes sense for the attribute to be on function bodies, not on prototypes. > > > Yeah, I noticed that after sending this patch. I modified it to check the function CI is in for that attribute. Once we have support for the `-fno-builtin-FUNCTION' flag, I expect the