Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "74b37c7c".
2011 Jul 08
0
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization with indirectbr terminator
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:15 PM, Carlo Alberto Ferraris wrote:
> I'll try to inspect the assembler. Just a quick thought in the mean time, in the snippet I posted, if the backedge pointed directly to %19, other optimizations would likely notice that the loop could be removed entirely and replaced with a single addition. Do you think the code generator is able t
> o do this?
Why would you
2011 Jul 08
4
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization with indirectbr terminator
Nella citazione giovedì 7 luglio 2011 19:41:16, John McCall ha scritto:
> On Jul 7, 2011, at 4:33 AM, Carlo Alberto Ferraris wrote:
>> Il 07/07/2011 11:14, Cameron Zwarich ha scritto:
>>> I haven't read the code in detail, but it looks like JumpThreading at
>>> least attempts to thread across indirect branches. You can either try
>>> to fix it or file a