search for: 73g

...d5110 NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE nfs-s5-p0/d5110 quota 600G local nfs-s5-s8/d5201 quota 600G local bash-3.00# bash-3.00# df -h | egrep "d5201|d5110" nfs-s5-p0/d5110 600G 527G 73G 88% /nfs-s5-p0/d5110 nfs-s5-s8/d5201 600G 314G 269G 54% /nfs-s5-s8/d5201 bash-3.00# NFS client (S10U1 + patches, NFSv3 mount over TCP): bash-3.00# df -h | egrep "d5201|d5110" NFS-srv:/nfs-s5-p0/d5110 600G 527G 73G 88% /opt/d5110 NFS-srv:/nfs-s5-s8/d5...

...e in the ext4 superblock the amount of data that has been > written to a filesystem over its lifetime: > > Note that this number isn't wholly accurate, but rather a guideline. Is is more like a completely bogus value at best: # LANG=C df -h / | grep root /dev/root 3.7T 3.6T 73G 99% / # grep [0-9] /proc/partitions 8 0 3907018584 sda # tune2fs -l /dev/sda | grep Lifetime Lifetime writes: 2503 GB 3.7 TB Disk/Partition, 3.6 TB space in use but only 2.4 TB writes. No, there are no 1.2 TB + x allocated but never written to clusters on that file system. An...

...onto disk. $ btrfs fi df / Data: total=71.23GB, used=68.16GB System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=24.00KB System: total=4.00MB, used=0.00 Metadata, DUP: total=4.75GB, used=2.26GB $ df -h / Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/campstovevg-root 81G 73G 3.4G 96% / $ mount | grep btrfs /dev/mapper/campstovevg-root on / type btrfs (rw,relatime,ssd) $ uname -a Linux campstove 2.6.36+ #5 SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 20 09:28:14 PST 2010 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM) Duo CPU L2400 @ 1.66GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux ~/btrfs-unstable $ git log -n1 | head -n3 commit 83...

...how different raid levels perform with fast CPUs and really fast disks. We recently got the first of the cluster machines (which has the following specs: (from penguin computing) 2x 1.6ghz woodcrest (so 4 cores total) 2g ram (we may upgrade to more, depending on what we seem to need) 6x 15k SAS 73G hard drives. I've always read that RAID 10 is the RAID of choice for mail, because the checksums take time and whatnot, but on a system that fast I'm sure that's not an issue (which I could see from the cpu usage during benchmarks.) We were also wondering whether RAID6 would be a go...

...2070 0 2070 >> >> uname -a >> Linux nas1 2.6.14.2-smp #2 SMP Thu Nov 17 15:31:40 GMT 2005 x86_64 >> x86_64 >> x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> df -h >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sda1 73G 6.0G 67G 9% / >> tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm >> /dev/sdb 6.9T 263G 6.6T 4% /storage >> >> lsscsi >> [0:0:0:0] disk ATA HTS541080G9SA00 MB4O /dev/sda >> [4:0:1:0] tape CERTANCE ULTRIUM 2 1775...

...f data that has been >> written to a filesystem over its lifetime: >> >> Note that this number isn't wholly accurate, but rather a guideline. > > Is is more like a completely bogus value at best: > > # LANG=C df -h / | grep root > /dev/root 3.7T 3.6T 73G 99% / > # grep [0-9] /proc/partitions > 8 0 3907018584 sda > # tune2fs -l /dev/sda | grep Lifetime > Lifetime writes: 2503 GB > > 3.7 TB Disk/Partition, 3.6 TB space in use but only 2.4 TB writes. > > No, there are no 1.2 TB + x allocated but never writt...

...d files can't be accessed , message "I/O error " display, all partitions become read-only no data lost and no data can be wirted ,only redress is a reboot. Distribution: REDHAT version 4 X86_64 update 5 Server Platform : IBM X 366 RAID Controller : IBM ServerRAID 8i Disks : 4*73G SAS ST --- RAID5 Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance. ---------------------- Greeting Danny -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20080228/215bc410/attachment.htm>

...r binding? e.g. python? Will i better off in using distributed search? My goal is to optimize the search, while the doc size will grow to very big,e.g. 100M+ My testing suit is using: Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz 8G ram 1x 10krpm WD HD My live servers: Dell R710 2x E5530 2.4G 24G RAM 1333MHz 8x 73G 15K RPM SAS raid 0 Cheers Andrey

On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Jelle de Jong <jelledejong at powercraft.nl> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I been using CF cards for almost more then 7 years now with ext > file-system without any major problems on ALIX boards. > > Last year I took 30 other systems in production with ext4 and the CF > cards been dropping out pretty fast, it may have been a bad batch but

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, I been using CF cards for almost more then 7 years now with ext file-system without any major problems on ALIX boards. Last year I took 30 other systems in production with ext4 and the CF cards been dropping out pretty fast, it may have been a bad batch but I do want to look at it. I don't think the devices writes a lot of IO (is

The standard controller that has been recommended in the past is the AOC-SAT2-MV8 - an 8 port with a marvel chipset. There have been several mentions of LSI based controllers on the mailing lists and I''m wondering about them. One obvious difference is that the Marvel contoller is PCI-X and the LSI controllers are PCI-E. Supermicro have several LSI controllers. AOC-USASLP-L8i with the