search for: 72g

...73M 849M 17% /u01 /dev/emcpowerd1 10G 2.2G 7.8G 22% /u04 /dev/emcpowere1 60G 59G 1.6G 98% /u06 /dev/emcpowerf1 133G 86G 47G 65% /u07 /dev/emcpowerg1 5.0G 715M 4.2G 14% /u02 /dev/emcpowerh1 5.0G 940M 4.0G 19% /u03 /dev/emcpoweri1 133G 61G 72G 46% /u08 /dev/emcpowerj1 10G 1.1G 8.9G 11% /u05 ######### fdisk -l /dev/emcpowere ##### Disk /dev/emcpowere: 64 heads, 32 sectors, 102400 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2048 * 512 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/emcpowere1 1 614...

...ently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 / Debian sparc # gcc62 9202 36G 6x0.4 GHz TI UltraSparc II (BlackBird) / 5 GB RAM / Sun Enterprise 4500 / Debian sparc # gcc63 9203 72G 8x4x1 GHz Sun UltraSparc T1 (Niagara) / 8 GB RAM / Sun Fire T1000 / Debian sparc Feel free to use them. I can give you login access if you send me a public ssh key. Ciao, Duncan.

...so I did: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 /dev/sda5 /dev/sdb5 # mount /dev/sda5 /btrfs and everything seems fine. Now what I find strange is that everything looks like a raid0 was created, not a raid1: $ df -h /btrfs/ Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda5 684G 72G 612G 11% /btrfs What am I doing (or understanding) wrong? Thanks! Jp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Chris, > FYI, I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct

...797.983 req_len 3083215798 499 2. the index is more than 3g is transmitted painfully, can U make a queue limit on the size of the request, segment them, adjust max size of post body in the configuration file dovecot.conf thx solr: 7.1.0 dovecot: 2.2.32 server: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.93GHz x24, 72G RAM

...p server can decompress and untar, and this server has quite good hardware. When I use iostat -x, I find that the %util of the device is averaging 80%. Here is the hardware involved: Oracle Server: HP Proliant 380DL + MSA70 16 GB ram 2 x Quad-core Xeons E5345 2.33 Ghz 9 RAID 10 volumes on 32 72G, 15K rpm SAS disks 1X Smart Array P400 w/512 MB BBU 1X Smart Array P800 w/512 MB BBU Database Server HP Proliant 360DL 2 x Quad-core Xeons E5345 2.33 Ghz 1 RAID 5 volume on 6 146 GB, 10K rpm SAS disks 1X Smart Array P400 w/512 MB BBU Any help or suggestions welcome. Regards, Ugo

Hi, We have a new 24-core Dell PowerEdge R905 server with 128GB's RAM. The 64 bits version of Fedora 12 lists the correct amount of 128GB, CentOS only finds 32GB (and so does Scientific Linux). I would much prefer to use CentOS (most of the software we use is specifically designed for CentOS). Does anyone know what is causing this/how to fix it? Many Thanks, Diederick -------------- next

Hi all, I am looking for a code sample that shows how to execute a host-command using Ruby or ROR and then read the output. Thanks, Onno This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any

...story August 13, 2003: Initial release -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBPzqwFWjtSoHZUTs5AQGN4AQAvL/u+S+FpkNWtBH/fe9DCLJQM21I/dzt QPU0prMxTq53ntvTOAth+yFPtbcbeDaWuLHakju0mL4OSU0Fp+VsXbXnF5ypE+0r S5mHpMxSmvPBPBNTIMQUGybEKK783P9Ty2lhXxawEW9JbdgMOY44clo2VIupgxuZ OeyQrFbsq54= =/72G -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi all, I've searched the depths of the resources on the internet; however I'm having trouble deploying a pxeboot solution via pxelinux. So far what I have successfully implemented in my infrastructure is a successful pxeboot setup for FreeBSD ( without the use of pxelinux ). I'd ultimately like to have a solution that will allow me to choose a network install of various Unix-like

...3 boot 2 107MB 85.9GB 85.8GB primary lvm 3 85.9GB 623GB 537GB primary lvm [root at vmail log]# [root at vmail log]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 560G 72G 460G 14% / /dev/vda1 99M 20M 75M 21% /boot tmpfs 1.5G 0 1.5G 0% /dev/shm [root at vmail log]# [root at vmail log]# [root at vmail log]# uname -a Linux vmail.noa.gr 2.6.18-308.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 17:08:00 EDT 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [root...

...faults 0 0 proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 /dev/md3 swap swap defaults 0 0 == END cat /etc/fstab == == BEGIN df -h == Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/md1 450G 72G 355G 17% / /dev/md0 190M 45M 136M 25% /boot == END df -h == == BEGIN fdisk -l == Disk /dev/md0 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md1 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md3 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sda: 500.1...

As mentioned last night, we''ve been reviewing a proposal for hot spare support in ZFS. Below you can find a current draft of the proposed interfaces. This has not yet been submitted for ARC review, but comments are welcome. Note that this does not include any enhanced FMA diagnosis to determine when a device is "faulted". This will come in a follow-on project, of which some