Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "72c8d993".
2011 Aug 22
0
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller
...the boxing-unboxing penalty and I was
wondering if there is a way to avoid it.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cafxx.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110822/72c8d993/attachment.vcf>
2011 Aug 22
2
[LLVMdev] Accessing arguments in a caller
Hi Carlo, rather than declaring individual stack variables
int x;
int y;
int z;
and so on, which requires you to pass each one, or a pointer to each one,
to your function, declare one stack variable of struct type that holds
them all:
struct StackObjects {
int x;
int y;
int z;
...
};
...
struct StackObjects stack;
then pass the address of stack to your