Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "72845".
Did you mean:
7284
2015 Apr 10
1
smbclient 4.0.7 fails transfer with STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER and SMB2 but not with NT1
...10.6.161.184 TCP 1514 [TCP segment of a reassembled PDU]
No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info
268 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688699000 10.5.12.227 10.6.161.184 SMB2 627 Write Request Len:72845 Off:0 File: scsmuser\Scan\DOC002.pdf
No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info
269 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688701000 10.6.161.184 10.5.12.227 TCP 66 445???35119 [ACK] Seq=1611 Ack=74211 Win=26704 Len=0 TSval=1...
2017 Jun 23
4
duplicated factor labels.
...erent result in cases the old behavior gave a valid factor.
>
>> I'm looking at a possible change currently
>> [not promising that a change will happen ...]
>
> In the end, I've liked the change (after 2-3 iterations), and
> now been brave to commit to R-devel (svn 72845).
>
> With the change, I had to disable one of our own regression
> checks (tests/reg-tests-1b.R, line 726):
>
> The following is now (in R-devel -> R 3.5.0) valid:
>
>> factor(1:2, labels = c("A","A"))
> [1] A A
> Levels: A
>>
>...
2017 Jun 22
2
duplicated factor labels.
>>>>> Paul Johnson <pauljohn32 at gmail.com>
>>>>> on Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:02:34 -0500 writes:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Joris Meys <jorismeys at gmail.com> wrote:
>> To extwnd on Martin 's explanation :
>>
>> In factor(), levels are the unique input values and labels the unique output
>>
2017 Jun 23
0
duplicated factor labels.
...; an error or a different result in cases the old behavior gave a valid factor.
> I'm looking at a possible change currently
> [not promising that a change will happen ...]
In the end, I've liked the change (after 2-3 iterations), and
now been brave to commit to R-devel (svn 72845).
With the change, I had to disable one of our own regression
checks (tests/reg-tests-1b.R, line 726):
The following is now (in R-devel -> R 3.5.0) valid:
> factor(1:2, labels = c("A","A"))
[1] A A
Levels: A
>
I wonder how many CRAN package checks will...
2017 Jun 23
0
duplicated factor labels.
...the old behavior gave a valid factor.
>>
>>> I'm looking at a possible change currently
>>> [not promising that a change will happen ...]
>>
>> In the end, I've liked the change (after 2-3 iterations), and
>> now been brave to commit to R-devel (svn 72845).
>>
>> With the change, I had to disable one of our own regression
>> checks (tests/reg-tests-1b.R, line 726):
>>
>> The following is now (in R-devel -> R 3.5.0) valid:
>>
>>> factor(1:2, labels = c("A","A"))
>> [1] A A
&...