Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "72000x".
Did you mean:
72000
2010 Mar 06
4
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote:
> Le 06/03/2010 11:43, José Fonseca a écrit :
>>
>> Attached are two patches with MSVC build enchancements.
>>
>> They are quite trivial, but were necessary to correctly link LLVM
>> libraries with Mesa3D on Windows.
>>
>> Jose
>>
>
> Are you volontary
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
Whoops, mailing list headers still broken, sending to the list this time:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 3:35 PM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Cédric Venet <cedric.venet at laposte.net> wrote:
>> So adding an option for adding this flag would be great but not changing the
>> default. (The flag is interesting because it can
2010 Mar 06
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: MSVC build enhancements
...utes, and yes that is accurate. That is a lot greater
>>>>> then just "10x".
>>>
>>> you mean the faster time *was* 10 ms, not that
>>> there was a 10 ms difference...
>>>
>>> 12 minutes = 720 seconds = 720000 ms. You describe a 72000x difference :)
>>
>> Correct, as stated, whoever at MS designed that code needs a swift
>> kick to their family jewels. ;-)
>>
>> Admittedly, it was a lot of template code, and most of it optimized
>> out and inlined beautifully, once those above definitions were...