Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "71f".
Did you mean:
71
2007 Jul 30
50
boot a existing windows in hvm domain
Hi all
don''t get such envionment to try now. so ask for help here.
imagine that two os installed.
Xen3.1 + Linux is installed in /dev/hda
and windows xp is installed in /dev/hdb
I don''t want to reboot to use windows. Is it possiable to boot the hdb
windows in xen?
i saw there are some threads about P2V in this mail list. will the P2V
tools help?
thanks
2007 Jul 30
50
boot a existing windows in hvm domain
Hi all
don''t get such envionment to try now. so ask for help here.
imagine that two os installed.
Xen3.1 + Linux is installed in /dev/hda
and windows xp is installed in /dev/hdb
I don''t want to reboot to use windows. Is it possiable to boot the hdb
windows in xen?
i saw there are some threads about P2V in this mail list. will the P2V
tools help?
thanks
2007 Oct 14
1
This is a fsck log,what's the problem?
...\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":89q.bmp".
(Short name 026\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":71F.bmp".
(Short name 027\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checksum for long file name ":8-a.bmp".
(Short name 028\0000000.\000MP may have changed without updating the
long name)
Not auto-correcting this.
Wrong checks...
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...70 6f jo 714 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x2c>
> 6a5: 6e outsb %ds:(%esi),(%dx)
> 6a6: 65 6e outsb %gs:(%esi),(%dx)
> - 6a8: 74 5f je 709 <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x21>
> - 6aa: 75 73 jne 71f <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x37>
> + 6a8: 74 5f je 709 <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x21>
> + 6aa: 75 73 jne 71f <__FUNCTION__.22481+0x37>
> 6ac: 65 gs
> - 6ad: 73 5f jae 70e <__FUNCTION__.22568+0x26>...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the