Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "718336b".
2011 Apr 11
3
[RFC][PATCH] virtio: 64 bit features
...; VIRTIO_F_FEATURES_HI)) {
+ vp_dev->features_hi = 1;
+ iowrite32(fhi, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_PCI_GUEST_FEATURES_HI);
+ } else {
+ vp_dev->features_hi = 0;
+ }
}
/* virtio config->get() implementation */
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
index aff5b4f..718336b 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct virtio_device {
struct virtio_config_ops *config;
struct list_head vqs;
/* Note that this is a Linux set_bit-style bitmap. */
- unsigned long features[1];
+ unsigned long features[64 / BITS_PER_LONG];...
2011 Apr 11
3
[RFC][PATCH] virtio: 64 bit features
...; VIRTIO_F_FEATURES_HI)) {
+ vp_dev->features_hi = 1;
+ iowrite32(fhi, vp_dev->ioaddr + VIRTIO_PCI_GUEST_FEATURES_HI);
+ } else {
+ vp_dev->features_hi = 0;
+ }
}
/* virtio config->get() implementation */
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio.h b/include/linux/virtio.h
index aff5b4f..718336b 100644
--- a/include/linux/virtio.h
+++ b/include/linux/virtio.h
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct virtio_device {
struct virtio_config_ops *config;
struct list_head vqs;
/* Note that this is a Linux set_bit-style bitmap. */
- unsigned long features[1];
+ unsigned long features[64 / BITS_PER_LONG];...
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I
sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches
I sent out earlier.
I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :)
I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12
to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot
of time testing performance,
2011 May 04
27
[PATCH 00/18] virtio and vhost-net performance enhancements
OK, here's a large patchset that implements the virtio spec update that I
sent earlier. It supercedes the PUBLISH_USED_IDX patches
I sent out earlier.
I know it's a lot to ask but please test, and please consider for 2.6.40 :)
I see nice performance improvements: one run showed going from 12
to 18 Gbit/s host to guest with netperf, but I did not spend a lot
of time testing performance,