Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "713b".
Did you mean:
713
2008 Nov 13
2
decoded sample is completely differen from original one
Hi all,
I have just started playing with speex, and come up with the following code, which just encode a frame of 160 shorts, and the decode it.
For some reason the decoded sample is completely different than the original one. is my code wrong? If so what? Or is it a reasonable which depends of values that weren't correctly set?
Thanks,
Andre
#include <stdio.h>
#include
2007 Jun 21
0
Network issue in RHCS/GFS environment
...636k>
1 39 58 2 1 0| 0 57M| 35B 35B: 63M 63M: 638B 607k>
1 25 74 0 1 0| 0 38M| 0 0 : 56M 56M: 847B 221k>
1 37 60 2 1 0| 0 55M| 35B 0 : 44M 42M:1354B 399k>
1 40 57 1 1 0| 0 61M| 0 35B: 63M 60M: 713B 447k>
My question is, why does eth1 run in high level "recv and send"? while eth2
has such low run level?I really do no know why eth1-recv rate is so high in
this test.
Please give me some hints or suggestions.
Thanks and Regards,
Phillip
2003 Sep 30
2
Samba-3.0.0-1 tdb_fetch failed
...2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] smbd/ipc.c:reply_trans(514)
trans <\PIPE\> data=72 params=0 setup=2
[2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] smbd/ipc.c:named_pipe(326)
named pipe command on <> name
[2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(288)
Got API command 0x26 on pipe "wkssvc" (pnum 713b)api_pipe_bind_req:
\PIPE\wkssvc -> \PIPE\ntsvcs
[2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:check_bind_req(727)
check_bind_req for \PIPE\wkssvc
[2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(890)
Transaction 42 of length 164
[2003/09/29 09:38:54, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(685)...