search for: 71182

...the box in question is out of our farm and available for testing, and I am motivated to cooperate. :-) The full debugging kernel options I used are: include SMP options KDB options KDB_TRACE options DDB options BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER options WITNESS options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN db> trace Tracing pid 71182 tid 100325 td 0xcc08b180 kdb_enter(c095f294) at kdb_enter+0x2b panic(c09768ad,1000,14000000,c145bc88,1000,...) at panic+0x127 kmem_malloc(c14680c0,1000,102,eba6a8cc,c07e3fa5,...) at kmem_malloc+0x89 page_alloc(c1453780,1000,eba6a8bf,102,c06b8a84,...) at page_alloc+0x1a slab_zalloc(c1453780,102,c145...

...gt; > > Thanks for clarifying! > >> >> I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has >> LNT-submitting bots, so the website can generate a comparison >> (e.g., >> http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182 >> <http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182>). >> Looking at this comparison shows a number of potential >> problems but also cases where Polly really helps (and, FWIW, >> the largest two compile-time regressions are...

...en with the GSoC last year, trying to get Polly as a "pluggable" dependency analysis. > > I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has LNT-submitting bots, > so the website can generate a comparison (e.g., http://lnt.llvm.org/db_ > default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182). Looking at this comparison shows > a number of potential problems but also cases where Polly really helps > (and, FWIW, the largest two compile-time regressions are also associated > with very large execution performance improvements). My first focus would > certainly be on pragma-dri...

...build on what's there in whatever ways make sense. > Thanks for clarifying! > >> I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has LNT-submitting bots, >> so the website can generate a comparison (e.g., >> http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182). Looking >> at this comparison shows a number of potential problems but also cases >> where Polly really helps (and, FWIW, the largest two compile-time >> regressions are also associated with very large execution performance >> improvements). My first focus would certainly...

...s these transformations through pragmas (and other kinds of optional enablement). This is an important first step. I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has LNT-submitting bots, so the website can generate a comparison (e.g., http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182). Looking at this comparison shows a number of potential problems but also cases where Polly really helps (and, FWIW, the largest two compile-time regressions are also associated with very large execution performance improvements). My first focus would certainly be on pragma-driven enablement....

...his will allow us to build on what's there in whatever ways make sense. > > I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has > LNT-submitting bots, so the website can generate a comparison > (e.g., > http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182 > <http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182>). > Looking at this comparison shows a number of potential problems > but also cases where Polly really helps (and, FWIW, the largest > two compile-time regressions are also associated with very large...

Dear All, I am a student enrolled google summer code 2007. My job is to write security regression testsuites for FreeBSD under the guidance of my mentor Dr. Robert Watson. Under his encourage, I write following request for comments RFC :-) ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// What I plan to do: 1) to test the stability of Mandatory Access Control and Audit

...te domain: unsupported configuration: Unable to find security driver for label selinux My libvirt config.log shows the SELinux security driver as yes: configure:71172: Configuration summary configure:71174: ===================== configure:71176: configure:71178: Drivers configure:71180: configure:71182: Xen: no configure:71184: QEMU: yes configure:71186: UML: yes configure:71188: OpenVZ: yes configure:71190: VMware: yes configure:71192: VBox: yes configure:71194: XenAPI: no configure:71196: xenlight: no configure:71198: LXC: yes configure:71200: PHYP: no...

...; through pragmas (and other kinds of optional enablement). This is an > important first step. > > I'm not sure exactly how good this is, but polly has LNT-submitting bots, so > the website can generate a comparison (e.g., > http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/71208?compare_to=71182). Looking at > this comparison shows a number of potential problems but also cases where > Polly really helps (and, FWIW, the largest two compile-time regressions are > also associated with very large execution performance improvements). My > first focus would certainly be on pragma-dri...

> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, >> >>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>>

On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> ** >> >> *Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of >> advanced loop transformations