Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "70x".
Did you mean:
0x
2006 Jan 30
3
Set caller id on Swedish PRI (euroisdn)
...setting outgoing caller id to "nothing" (secret)
on our Wildcard TE405P connected to a swedish euroisdn line. Caller ID
seems to work fine when connecting the same line to a Ericsson PBX - so
something must be wrong in my settings, but I don't know what.
I've tried:
exten => _*70X.,1,Set(CALLERID(name)="") exten =>
_*70X.,2,Set(CALLERID(num)="") exten =>
_*70X.,3,Dial(Zap/g0/${EXTEN:3}|60|T)
But the result is always that the caller id is our main number
(A-number).
Here is an from zapata.conf:
[channels]
language=se
context=from-pstn
switchtype=e...
2013 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
...for (c=0; c<n; c++)
> for (d=0; d<n; d++)
> for (e=0; e<n; e++)
> for (f=0; f<n; f++)
> x++;
> Polly would significantly increases the compile-time from 0.0320s to 2.3320 (70x), but it also reduces the execution time from 0.048s to 0.004s (12x). Maybe it is worth, but I think that would be eif we can reduce the compile-time without hurting the execution performance.
Sure. Any ideas what is going on here? It seems you have a couple of
open problems. It probably makes se...
2013 Aug 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
... for (b=0; b<n; b++)
for (c=0; c<n; c++)
for (d=0; d<n; d++)
for (e=0; e<n; e++)
for (f=0; f<n; f++)
x++;
Polly would significantly increases the compile-time from 0.0320s to 2.3320 (70x), but it also reduces the execution time from 0.048s to 0.004s (12x). Maybe it is worth, but I think that would be eif we can reduce the compile-time without hurting the execution performance.
> My plan is to continue investigating why PollyDependence pass leads to such high compile-time overhe...
2013 Aug 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
...<n; c++)
>> for (d=0; d<n; d++)
>> for (e=0; e<n; e++)
>> for (f=0; f<n; f++)
>> x++;
>> Polly would significantly increases the compile-time from 0.0320s to 2.3320 (70x), but it also reduces the execution time from 0.048s to 0.004s (12x). Maybe it is worth, but I think that would be eif we can reduce the compile-time without hurting the execution performance.
>
>Sure. Any ideas what is going on here? It seems you have a couple of
>open problems. It proba...
2013 Aug 08
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
On 08/08/2013 01:29 AM, Star Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I have summarized the top 10 compiler passes for Polly when compiling LLVM test-ssuite. Results can be viewed on:
> https://gist.github.com/tanstar/581bcea1e4e03498f935/raw/f6a4ec4e8565f7a7bbdb924cd59fcf145caac039/Polly-top10
>
>
> Based on the comparison between "clang -O3" and "polly -O3"
2013 Aug 08
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
Hi all,
I have summarized the top 10 compiler passes for Polly when compiling LLVM test-ssuite. Results can be viewed on:
https://gist.github.com/tanstar/581bcea1e4e03498f935/raw/f6a4ec4e8565f7a7bbdb924cd59fcf145caac039/Polly-top10
Based on the comparison between "clang -O3" and "polly -O3" listed on:
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...~hvNA%dmK|kWi&PTnDda9t{_=|cBP9bABRsm*s8l5%Enbzz3AcD4NvTp
zr<3qZ^?#~^6o=(6tzSfabM?$;6|`pcjniS9vb>2##Et_WMT<^yhsL%wM+D{Wuqbzj
z)(2{4%JqVBy(N_EqYTu)I*W4K97MZA5bX{P{`9QPje<Ndug8p?nuBuvR31l8X+Izg
zH1-NW3|>-hfFHLirQ9Jr9<HSWxI%YOt{=~@II5Hx92FDWDwByuFe#nYbG at QWRB1_j
zESg13+Ee*Iim<70x?JQ05mnTDkBO)<*aVNAG$6t8f|}Bmlso=LOxanLu1Z&E#|wp>
zm1#L=;QToGn9gvrkLgTVkLg5NkLdy%a1%qcw1X&Xr?x6(atJxb#T at -Cw#m`cbQzPE
z=^(HDWuPnHXu4Wzb44b&-DSKB!3xRL%&ZAMcDbEnEBK}r4KOPCDdjjyIgV-+YvL)v
z#G_#|{%BZD-WhJm-We{{ge%?7#0l^FwZ#+Om3FlRExR=gKQ?x?pP|}5uJ#Xb(oZ>7
zhbh*qB|#_gDOLMvSiL|+...