Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "70mib".
Did you mean:
70mb
2016 Sep 06
2
No increased throughput with SMB Multichannel and two NICs
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:53:04PM +0200, Daniel Vogelbacher via samba wrote:
> > Delete all the crap above first :-).
> >
> > Then start trying to copy locally to the tmpfs share to see what
> > the max local copy speed it.
> >
>
> Now I have:
>
> server multi channel support = yes
> vfs objects = aio_pthread,recycle
> aio read size = 1
> aio
2010 Jan 20
2
SMB/CIFS seq. transfers top out at 30MiB/s (NFSv4 and HTTP: 100MiB/s+)
...same, compared to these settings' default values. Playing with the clients'
mount options (rsize and wsize, specifically) didn't yield any noticeable
improvements, either.
I continue to see other peoples' reports on the web that they manage to
squeeze much higher transfer rates (70MiB/s+) out of dedicated NAS appliances
via SMB/CIFS (most of which supposedly also run Samba for providing that
service), and I fail to see why my platform won't deliver similar results, as
the hardware should easily match whatever those NAS-devices offer.
Below I will list what I think might...
2017 Jun 19
8
Next steps for optimization remarks?
Hello all,
In https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq0q1hfzidg, Adam Nemet (cc'ed)
describes optimization remarks and some future plans for the project. I had
a few follow-up questions:
1. As an example of future work to be done, the talk mentions expanding the
set of optimization passes that emit remarks. However, the Clang User
Manual mentions that "optimization remarks do not really make