search for: 707295d4

On Jan 24, 2012, at 8:58 PM, Brent Walker wrote: > Thank you for your reply. The compromise you describe below, is it a > compromise in the LLVM back end or in clang? I run into this while > building a compiler for a small DSL language for which I generate > functions that receive a context from which they extract a bunch of > pointers to doubles from which inputs are passed to

...> LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120131/707295d4/attachment.html>

Thank you for your reply. The compromise you describe below, is it a compromise in the LLVM back end or in clang? I run into this while building a compiler for a small DSL language for which I generate functions that receive a context from which they extract a bunch of pointers to doubles from which inputs are passed to the function (I just used C/clang in my examples to illustrate the problem).