search for: 700gib

...I've just had to deal with it rather than invest the time to do the research. > > > Harriscomputer > > Leroy Tennison > Network Information/Cyber Security Sp Hi Leroy, I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless.

...> >>> >>> Harriscomputer >>> >>> Leroy Tennison >>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp >> >> Hi Leroy, >> >> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking >> about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then >> rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. >> > > unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to > restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for > specific files will be faster. And...

...> time to do the research. > > > > > > Harriscomputer > > > > Leroy Tennison > > Network Information/Cyber Security Sp > > Hi Leroy, > > I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking > about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then > rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >

...the research. >>> >>> Harriscomputer >>> >>> Leroy Tennison >>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp >> Hi Leroy, >> >> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking >> about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then >> rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > ______...

...vest the time to do the research. >> >> >> Harriscomputer >> >> Leroy Tennison >> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp > > Hi Leroy, > > I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking > about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then > rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. > unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for specific files will be faster. And it will help your backup...

...arriscomputer >>>> >>>> Leroy Tennison >>>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp >>> >>> Hi Leroy, >>> >>> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking >>> about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then >>> rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. >>> >> >> unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to >> restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for >> specific f...

...;>>>>> Leroy Tennison >>>>>> Network Information/Cyber Security Sp >>>>> >>>>> Hi Leroy, >>>>> >>>>> I think that in my case I could not use a tgz archive. I'm speaking about full backups that reach 600/700GiB, compressing them and then rsync them could take so much time that it will be useless. >>>>> >>>> >>>> unless you use tape (of that high capacity), it is advantageous to restrict volume size to, say, 50GB. Then when you restore, search for specific files will...

Hi Leroy, How I can confirm that during rsync transfer corruption are not encountered? Thank you in advance. Il 01/07/20 16:04, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: > I've used rsync (but probably not for the size you're referring to), it works and has enough features to meet most needs. I have had a single situation where corruption occurred during transfer (a few times, have no idea why),