Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "700g".
Did you mean:
700
2003 Aug 06
1
External journal has more than one user
Hi,
I got this error:
EXT3-fs: External journal has more than one user (unsupported) - 3
..and my 700G volume is mounted as ext2.
Can I tell the external journal to forget its other users without having
to rebuild the big volume?
Matt
2015 Nov 19
2
Re: recovering corrupt file system
well, the next place to go, if fsck isn't enough would be to to try
debugfs(1)
man debugfs.
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Boylan, Ross <Ross.Boylan@ucsf.edu> wrote:
> I guess some of the trouble was that the virtual disk was mounted
> read-only at the VM level. When I mounted read/write I was able to do
> fsck, which gave messages about replaying the logs and a couple
2013 Apr 26
1
[nut] usbhid-ups: trailing spaces in nut-scanner output not ignored when trying to find ups (#26)
...AM, Christian Wiese wrote:
> I created a pull request #27 which is fixing the issue.
>
> # nut-scanner -qNU
> [nutdev1]
> driver = "usbhid-ups"
> port = "auto"
> vendorid = "051D"
> productid = "0002"
> product = "Back-UPS ES 700G FW:871.O2 .I USB FW:O2"
> serial = "5B1243T01934"
> vendor = "APC"
> bus = "002"
My main concern: why are spaces getting added in the first place? Is this coming from a strange version of libusb? (A quick look at the nut-scanner source code didn't sh...
2008 Jul 15
1
Much higher disk usage in OCFS2 then in XFS
Hi all,
I created a OCFS2 volume with a block size of 4kB and a clustersize of
4kB. After I mounted the volume the first time there have been already
over 600 MB in use. Then I started to copy a directory with a overall
size of 1784 MB(measured on an XFS with "du"). After an hour about 4
GB(!) have been used on the OCFS2 volume so I stopped the copy.
The files I copied are mostly
2000 Apr 05
8
strange problem
Hello.
I have a problem that I hope you can help me with.
I have 95,98 and NT machines and a Linux box with samba 2.2.5 (or what ever is
shipped with redhat) that shares a printer to the windows machines.
The problem is now:
-the NT machines finds the printer!
-the 98 machine finds something, but rejects all passwords (it runs encryot.
passwd)
-the 95 does not find anything at all. (runs encrypt