search for: 6yearold

...cture and of it's instance at the same time. But it called implicitly > when the instance above is being instantiated. > As I mentioned before I already tried to include this header with no > success. I work in Linux, so it's really strange. > > > 2011/9/2 arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Semion Prihodko <semion.ababo at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, guys. >>> >>> Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project ( >>> https://github.com/ababo/AntOS). Cannot instantiate JIT exe...

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 12:38 PM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gleb, > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 07:28, Gleb Popov <6yearold at gmail.com> wrote: > > def StoreStackF : InstRI<2, (outs), (ins IntRegs:$reg, i32imm:$i), > > "storestackf $reg, [$i]", [(store_stack i32:$reg, > AddrFI:$i)]>; > > > > I'm puzzled why despite having "IntRegs:$reg" in...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: >> Or to say it with other words: patches welcome. > > So, how should i proceed? Make CMake-generated config to be identical to > autotools one? That would be a good thing. Please note that some checks are a bit tricky. A function that on platform A is on...

> > We may just not use those functions anymore - do you have a list of these? > Yes, i've started to make up a list of those functions, but it haven't finished yet. > This is more concerning - maybe it's a windows specific problem that came > along? > Not sure, i haven't look yet for CMake checking code itself. By the way, i'm using FreeBSD. Or to say it

...'s instance at the same time. But it called >> implicitly when the instance above is being instantiated. >> As  I mentioned before I already tried to include this header with no >> success. I work in Linux, so it's really strange. >> >> 2011/9/2 arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Semion Prihodko <semion.ababo at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, guys. >>>> Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project >>>> (https://github.com/ababo/Ant...

Hi, guys. Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project ( https://github.com/ababo/AntOS). Cannot instantiate JIT execution engine (NULL returns; message: Interpreter has not been linked in.). As you can see from the code I call InitializeNativeTarget. Also I tried to directly include the "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h" header, but with no success. I link with `llvm-config --ldflags

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:59 AM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 at 06:26, Gleb Popov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> While the store is being selected LLVM will just treat the value being > >> stored as a generic pointer-width integer unless you have written a > >> specific pattern for

Hello. I'm posting this question here, because there seem to be no LLD-specific mailing list. Sorry in advance if this is wrong one. I compile two C source with following command: clang -flto -o %name.bc %name.c LLVM is augmented with my custom pass, which amongst other things create a global with appending linkage: @myvar = appending constant [1 x [1 x i8]*] ... I also have another pass

Okay, i've started slowly working. Who can i send patches for review, when they will be ready? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110106/88a7e893/attachment.html>

Hello all, I wanna build a static linked executable using llvm. But I failed. My question is Can we use -static using llvm? Thanks for any response. Below is details ======== First I use $ clang++ test.cc `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs` I works as usual. But if I use $ clang++ test.cc `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs` -static It yells lots of undefined reference, like

You are missing references for pthread. Try to add -pthread to build line. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110108/90c573ca/attachment.html>

[cc-ing llvm-dev] arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > Hello. I've found that CMake-generated llvm-config contains -pedantic flag, > if LLVM_ENABLE_PEDANTIC was ON during cmake configuration. > This forces all llvm-config clients to build their sources with -pedantic, > which, i think, is kind of wrong. >...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > >> How do they build their frontend? >> > They are running llvm-config. And it gives -pedantic, if it was generated by > CMake build. If i build LLVM with autoconf,...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: >> Here is output of llvm-config built by CMake: > >> ~/.local/llvm/bin/llvm-config --cflags >> -I/usr/home/arr/.local/llvm/include -O3 -DNDEBUG -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS >> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings &gt...

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is

[CCing llvm-dev] arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > Hello. Suppose i'm writing a tool, which uses LLVM and i want it to be > buildable like clang - from tools/ subdir or standalone build. Since i'm not > very experinced with CMake, i've took your code from clang and tried to > adapt it. Now i stumb...

Hello. When i run llvm-config --libs jit bitreader bitwriter ipo linker engine i get: -lLLVMX86Disassembler -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter -lLLVMMCParser -lLLVMX86AsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Utils -lLLVMX86Info -lLLVMLinker -lLLVMArchive -lLLVMipo -lLLVMBitWriter -lLLVMBitReader -lLLVMJIT -lLLVMExecutionEngine -lLLVMCodeGen -lLLVMScalarOpts -lLLVMInstCombine

Hi everyone! I'm trying compile an compiler project that uses LLVM 2.9, and I'm having difficult with the error "Don't have a definition for uint64_t on this platform". I set the '__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS' and '__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS' defines, and save the "DataTypes.h.in" as "DataTypes.h", to compiler can locate them. I'm using

On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:52 PM, geovanisouza92 at gmail.com < geovanisouza92 at gmail.com> wrote: > I set the '__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS' and '__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS' defines, and > save the "DataTypes.h.in" as "DataTypes.h", to compiler can locate them. > Don't do this, it's wrong. The "DataTypes.h" should be created from "

On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:18 AM, arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello. I have an .bc, which defines @foo(%type* arg1, %type* arg2, %type* > arg3). > Firstly, i do this: > > runtimeModule = getLazyIRFileModule("runtime.bc", smd, llctx); > > then this: > > fooFunction = runtimeModule->getFunction(&...