search for: 6tb

I have an Infortrend RAID box I'd like to see as one big 6TB partition, but I only can get 2.2TB partitions to work. I was trying to do this with an Adaptec controller but apparently they are only (any of them) 48 bits wide. Does anybody have a working system for SCSI/Centos over 2.2TB? Milt Mallory Topix.com 650-461-8316 Always consider the issues...

Hello, Im about to migrate a 6Tb database from Veritas Volume Manager to ZFS, I want to set arc_max parameter so ZFS cant use all my system''s memory, but i dont know how much i should set, do you think 24Gb will be enough for a 6Tb database? obviously the more the better but i cant set too much memory. Have someone implem...

Hi all, Trying to mount an FW800 6TB volumes. The logs say; cannot find hfs+ superblock and volumes larger then 2TB are not supported yet Is my case really because of the >2TB volume? Thanks in advance, - aurf

i posted on rhel list about proper creating of 6tb ext3 filesystem and tuning here.......http://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-November/msg00239.html i am reading lots of ext3 links like...... http://www.redhat.com/support/wpapers/redhat/ext3/ http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2005-September/052533.html http://batleth.sapienti-sat....

.... When i used 3.2rc6 it happened randomly on both machines after 50-500gb of writes. with rc7 it happens after much less writes, probably 10gb or so, but only on machine 1 for the time being. machine 2 has not crashed yet after 200gb of writes and I am still testing that. machine 1: btrfs on a 6tb sparse file, mounted as loop, on a xfs filesystem that lies on a 10TB md raid5. mount options compress=zlib,compress-force machine 2: btrfs over md raid 5 (4x2TB)=5.5TB filesystem. mount options compress=zlib,compress-force pastebins: machine1: 3.2rc7 http://pastebin.com/u583G7jK 3.2rc6 http:...

Server is a Lenovo RV-340 E2420 build 70AB001VUX 8go Support for Sata-3 6gbps and Raid-5 Did someone can tell if it can handle 6tb hard drives? -- Michel Donais

It turns out that the release of Centos-3.3 was so popular, that it threw us way over the threshold of our ISP's, and now we are stuck with a _very_ large bill (as in an estimated 6TB of transfers). While in one hand I am ecstatic that we are so successful, but on the other hand, that is coming out of the developers pockets. The developers should be the last ones footing these bills (and this one was very large). You can help. Please consider a donation for each of the systems...

Hi, Does anyone have experiences about ARC-1883I SAS controller with CentOS7? I am planning to have RAID1 setup and I am wondering if I should use the controller's RAID functionality which has 2GB cache or should I go with JBOD + Linux software RAID? The disks I am going to use are 6TB Seagate Enterprise ST6000NM0034 7200rpm SAS/12Gbit 128 MB If hardware RAID is preferred, the controller's cache could be updated to 4GB and I wonder how much performance gain this would give me? Thanks! Peter

hi, our current servers are suffering from a weird hardware issue that forces us to start over. in short we have two servers with 15 disks at 6TB each, divided into three raid5 arrays for three bricks per server at 22TB per brick. each brick on one server is replicated to a brick on the second server. the hardware issue is that somewhere in the backplane random I/O errors happen when the system is under load. these cause the raid to fail dis...

Does Samba have any max filesytem limitations. In particular can both 2.2.8 and 3.0 support 2TB+ filesystems. For now, I am thinking of 6TB max, so I don't need to know about Petabytes or Exabytes. The other side of the question, is can Win9x, Win2K, etc. work with filesystems over 2 TB. If the above is in a FAQ somewhere, a url would be great. Greg -- Greg Freemyer

...21000 rw-p b7e00000 00:00 0 b7e21000-b7f00000 ---p b7e21000 00:00 0 b7f13000-b7f15000 rw-p b7f13000 00:00 0 bff36000-bff4b000 rw-p bff36000 00:00 0 [stack] Aborted ================================================================================= I'm trying to give OCFS2 format to a 6TB iSCSI partition/device, this is the system information: - ocfs2-tools-1.2.7-1.el5, official RPM package from Oracle. - Self compiled OCFS2 v1.3.9-0.1 under a CentOS 5 box: ./configure --with-kernel=/lib/modules/`uname -r`/build --enable-vfs-rename-patch-override=yes make make install - Running...

...In general... We are running RedHat WS 3 Update 6, 2.4.21-40.2.ELsmp or 2.4.21-37.ELsmp We have a small SAN system that looks like this 3 NFS servers each containing 2 Qlocic hba's connected to 2 qlogic switches connected to an nstor (now xyratex) 6TB raid system containing 2 (active-active) controllers. On the first 2 occasions one of the controllers was failed over. On a 3rd occasion both SAN switches lost power, and the hosts and raid lost communication. On all occasions the qlocic failover driver tried to start up on the alterna...

Hi all, We're looking at replacing our existing NFS setup and using local storage on multiple nodes - using Director to send clients to the correct node. We have about 10,000 mailboxes using about 6TB at the moment, a mix of IMAP and POP, probably 65% IMAP. I'm thinking of moving from Maildir to Dbox; using 2TB NVMe drives in RAID1 as primary storage and 4x 6TB SATA disks in RAID10 for altstorage and probably smaller SATA SSDs in RAID1 for the indexes. I guess my question is, have other pe...

Hi, I'm using SimpleStopper with TermGenerator in a Python indexing script, in an attempt to keep my index size down (currently 30K per doc, and I have 200 million docs to index, which I think implies 6TB.) However, unprefixed (positional?) terms are not affected by the stopper, though Z-prefixed terms are. I assume this is intentional for phrase queries, but I need to reduce my index size drastically. Is it possible to generate positional terms, filtered with a stoplist, and not generate th...

...if anyone is using it on a large scale. I have a client who is contemplating consolidating Windows file/print servers into a Linux partition on an iSeries. The show stopper is whether rsync (or any replication product) can and will replicate a) at the file level, and b)a database approaching .6TB in size. Automation and accuracy are key. Thanks in advance for any information! Laura __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

Ok I've a HP mircoserver that I'm building up. It's got 4 bays for be used for data that I'm considering setup up woth softwere raid (mdadm) I've 2 x 2TB 2 x 2.5 TB and 2 x 1TB, I'm leaning towards usig the 4 2.x TB is a raid 5 array to get 6TB. Now the data is on the 2.5TB disks currently. So the plan so far. Building the array as a degraded raid 5 with the 2 x 2TB disks that are emply. Copy the data from one of the 2.5TB disks on to array. Add now empty 2.5TB disk to the Array and wait for it to rebuild. Copy contents of remaining 2....

My google-fu appears to be weak today... I currently have 8*4Tb in a RAID6. So far I'm only using 6Tb PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree Used /dev/md6 Large lvm2 a-- 21.83t 15.37t 6.46t Let's say I wanted to remove 2 of these disks from the array and shrink it down to a 6*4Tb How would I do this? -- rgds Stephen

I have a 10x2 distributed replica volume running gluster3.8. Each of my bricks is about 60TB in size. ( 6TB drives Raid 6 10+2 ) I am running of storage so I intend on adding servers with larger 8Tb drives. My new bricks will be 80TB in size. I will make sure the replica to the larger brick will match in size. Will gluster place more files on the larger bricks? Or will I have wasted space? In other wor...

Hello all, I am looking to build a larger array (6TB) using CentOS 4.4 to archive data to. We want to have the Windows server mount this array as a local drive so we were looking at iSCSI to do it. I have played with it in the past and gotten it to work in this combo, but I have a question about access to the data on the local (Centos) machine....

...e a bunch of questions to ask and I probably have a bunch more that I should but do not know enough yet to ask. >From what I have read it appears that the system disk must use RAID 1 if it uses RAID at all. Is this the case? If so, is there any benefit to be had by taking two of the 8 drives (6Tb) solely to hold the OS and boot partition? Should these two drives be pulled and replaced with two smaller ones or should we bother with RAID for the boot disk at all? Given that one or two drive bays will be given over to the OS what should be the configuration of the remaining six? It appears...