search for: 6mo

Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "6mo".

Did you mean: 6mb
2016 Jun 25
0
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
...n extra digit for > minor releases. > This would mirror other projects doing the same, so there is precedent. Although radically different from the current model, I think it has some merit. When people report bugs with 3.1, its actually hard to estimate how it is (roughly estimating it via ~6mo release cycle does really work). This would certainly make it easier. Its a good alternative though it does mean that we no longer have the ability to indicate a major shift. However as Chris already pointed out, LLVM is much more stable these days and perhaps worrying about major shifts which ar...
2016 Jun 25
2
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Richard suggested that since we do time-based rather than > feature-based releases, the distinction between a release with or > without major changes is arbitrary, and we should move to a scheme > where we update the major version number on each release (4.0, 5.0, > etc.) with
2003 Sep 07
4
data manipulation
Hi, I am new to R, coming from a few years using Stata. I've been twisting my brain and checking several R and S references over the last few days to try to solve this data management problem: I have a data set with a unique patient identifier that is repeated along multiple rows, a variable with month of patient encounter, and a continous variable for cost of individual encounters. The data
2011 Oct 28
1
Graphics Reciprocal labeling
Does R graphics have a way to easily label the horizontal axis by the reciprocal of the scaled value? -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Graphics-Reciprocal-labeling-tp3949054p3949054.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2006 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] going from gcc 4.0.1 to gcc 4.2
Hi Kenneth, On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 11:58 +0100, Kenneth Hoste wrote: > Hello LLVM-people, > > I realize most of you have other things on their head now, with the > 1.9 release coming up, but I'd like to ask some questions regarding > the llvm-gcc frontend. Okay. > The current llvm-gcc4 frontend is based on GCC 4.0.1, as far as I can > tell from the docs. I also
2006 Nov 08
2
[LLVMdev] going from gcc 4.0.1 to gcc 4.2
Hello LLVM-people, I realize most of you have other things on their head now, with the 1.9 release coming up, but I'd like to ask some questions regarding the llvm-gcc frontend. The current llvm-gcc4 frontend is based on GCC 4.0.1, as far as I can tell from the docs. I also understand that GCC 4.1.x will probably be skipped, to go to the upcoming GCC 4.2 release directly (which is
2009 Feb 17
32
Backing up ZFS snapshots
I have an OpenSolaris snv_105 server at home that holds my photos, docs, music, etc, in a zfs pool. I backup my laptops with rsync to the OpenSolaris server. All of my important data is in one place, on the OpenSolaris server. I want to backup this data. I want to protect against losing my data, and I would also like to recover previous versions of files when I make mistakes. * I do not have a
2010 Oct 08
5
Slow link/Capacity changed + Kernel OOPS... possible hardware issues, ideas?
well after recently talking about how i haven''t had any problems with btrfs on several machines for ~1.5yrs... it happens :-( ) 2.6.35 kernel ) btrfs on partition 2 of sda ) no special mkfs or mount options used (except ssd) my fiancé''s EEE S101 netbook, w/SSD, is failing hard. when booting normally (subvol=__active), no special boot options, it hangs at udev... it all
2020 Feb 27
2
[PATCH] Update the 5 year logo to 10 year logo
...KXRCZ6Kv7cSis1{L+&)kff0^&r2`Apz- z4#K+kPxNxl>K`+C;_E<B%ig>!5A+8n0Nm|-wwh(stzX44M97U{XsG+hxMp3FvOd_% zD~XnBn{MOCK_Ahe6BC{)sb0YFDruYFctf3+D5I<|tX{}<ii#8O(-pLQWObJJRFgpl za8#rkw_xv5Gi?88S7~b)C*G*V-te__@=}&{C3m*kID7SN_GIDa(4@CIGm<X+YWzNQ zz;s*~6Y;z4FRKP1eyewbh@$7Ng^?;;Zj8N#6MO^qrkdW^y`?;_zaDsi9wDvAo%rn6 z-NQ=VfPd5L0U<fR;w)=3W`A>p*Df3T*&ZU^Be{(J!)iTvC#;MI#-AuLG4aZ<)sZ3y zdX00LoSeMIY>Lpp*MsFx_s{ujElPpveZcb8Qicz_CG|8kG&_@PqTGht2L@7qpP!dS z47n+?n!*XyjfVa<z5DiPd>QOpY`e=sPY5?k0Sn?8az(!0?rjnIDgi8qo^<YPdcHx- zSZ0VUEEyvb^WTUZ;<YHd$hsp>h~H?;zwl8+...
2009 Jul 23
1
[PATCH server] changes required for fedora rawhide inclusion.
...eb(I`#cLpbI6P2Tu9gsUOesG!NCo-f?e z^pcX?p&r4InV%t#YYEpr^3*DpgTIC$w;0DfQ-8$KZUD|T8Q3 at z%ZS?ybI#<IWUlCv z%n-{f)>w99eKDd(CnH)*c3sWI18rI9uSsfmpg&S&Q$%U&cCo)-Tv0`WH5s-BMJZX) ztH3VNt3bUx0JD2ZqQSq&TBemHI(;sAWngY!P8pZ`Q5>7}+v3vFiA*g^I60a3dvcv$ zE)I2~Nn3NedPD8K;nvsv{`xL4E-JQ`)Y76mOFg{{OKvId<LP&2nzcpR_Q)0RmiYqa zMQnQS!aF?!i at TTh^c45$*0ZR8dT*48CuB9!?xl&sXoMph)fD$0(A(3!xPQN1g?D*M zi+dNPV-EV6&W5z`6)B!FZ%8_o;!eQriIbVj6BC--W4S2u<^ZZv-e2g8E1oLG-Ajzi zWivx-G6iqqSu{&@G|6+%z=75r0rWst!h4yCR8g(fWiYzqyW7O}I1 at JObdM|&lZ3-l z-?y?74vVua7y`d2nwj9HN=LkDoKJwM=^pElQ...